OJ showed up in court so the analogy breaks down.
Criminal case compared to Congressional subpoena, so the analogy breaks down again.
OJ showed up in court so the analogy breaks down.
Criminal case compared to Congressional subpoena, so the analogy breaks down again.
He was found not guilty. He “got away with it.” So what he did is “ok.”
Paul_Thomson:What if the GoP house and senate pass legislation that makes it illegal for government agencies to withhold information from oversight committees?
Given the precedent Jim Jordan and others set of ignoring subpoenas from the J5 Committee, how can you even imagine that all the villains you see won’t use Jordan’s action as precedent and tell your heroes to pound sand?
A law change yrumps precedent. Did the J6 take those refusals to the judiciary to rule on the legitimacy of the Let’s go Brandon Day Committee and its subpoenas?
He was found not guilty. He “got away with it.” So what he did is “ok.”
But the issue at hand is responding to subpoenas, not the judgment of a jury. So what are you talking about?
A law change yrumps precedent. Did the J6 take those refusals to the judiciary to rule on the legitimacy of the Let’s go Brandon Day Committee and its subpoenas?
Let’s peel this back a notch. None of the people you want to see prosecuted were indicted or referred for prosecution by Durham after three years of investigation. Do you still think they should be prosecuted? If Durham failed to find what you wish, why do you think there is anything out there?
WuWei:He was found not guilty. He “got away with it.” So what he did is “ok.”
But the issue at hand is responding to subpoenas, not the judgment of a jury. So what are you talking about?
“Getting away with it”
And hypocrisy.
It’s enough.
Let’s peel this back a notch. None of the people you want to see prosecuted were indicted or referred for prosecution by Durham after three years of investigation. Do you still think they should be prosecuted? If Durham failed to find what you wish, why do you think there is anything out there?
Until there is a non-partisan DoJ and FBI, willing to try the identified bad actors in a non-partisan setting, there is absolutely no point in indicting any big fish. But if 47 is able to sleuce out the Elisian stalls and install men of integrity in top, positions, we may indeed see action taken to hold those identified bad actors to account.
H_Arendt:Let’s peel this back a notch. None of the people you want to see prosecuted were indicted or referred for prosecution by Durham after three years of investigation. Do you still think they should be prosecuted? If Durham failed to find what you wish, why do you think there is anything out there?
Until thete is a non-partisan DoJ and FBI, willing to try the identified bad actors on a non-partisan settong, there is absolutely no point in indicting any big fish. But if 47 is able to sleuce out the
Always always always a rationalization or an excuse.
He didn’t even try to lock her up by the way. 45
Until thete is a non-partisan DoJ and FBI, willing to try the identified bad actors on a non-partisan settong, there is absolutely no point in indicting any big fish. But if 47 is able to sleuce out the
Durham and Barr spent a year of the Trump administration traveling around Europe tracking down leads and came up with nothing. Quite a few of those leads came from leaks from the New York FBI office to Guiliani. Are you asserting that Barr, Durham and Guiiani were partisans opposed to Donald Trump?
Durham and Barr spent a year of the Trump administration traveling around Europe tracking down leads and came up with nothing. Quite a few of those leads came from leaks from the New York FBI office to Guiliani. Are you asserting that Barr, Durham and Guiiani were partisans opposed to Donald Trump?
Were Durham, Barr and Guiliano running the FBI.top-tiers? Barr was a deep state loyalist, unfortunately.
Were Durham, Barr and Guiliano running the FBI.top-tiers? Barr was a deep state loyalist, unfortunately.
The FBI top tiers were being managed by Wray – another Trump appointee so obviously a flaming liberal and secret paramour of Hillary Clinton no doubt.
You do realize that no matter whether 47 is Ron DeSantis or Pete Buttigieg, anyone they appoint will be denounced as partisan by the other side?
H_Arendt:Durham and Barr spent a year of the Trump administration traveling around Europe tracking down leads and came up with nothing. Quite a few of those leads came from leaks from the New York FBI office to Guiliani. Are you asserting that Barr, Durham and Guiiani were partisans opposed to Donald Trump?
Were Durham, Barr and Guiliano running the FBI.top-tiers? Barr was a deep state loyalist, unfortunately.
More excuses. Can only be failed. Always.
More excuses. Can only be failed. Always.
Senator Hawley is correct that there is a crisis of masculinity in the United States. Where he is wrong is not recognizing that it is mostly grown men with substantial agency whining about how unfair everything is.
To quote my father, “Who told you the world was going to be fair? Pick yourself an take care of business”
The FBI top tiers were being managed by Wray – another Trump appointee so obviously a flaming liberal and secret paramour of Hillary Clinton no doubt.
You do realize that no matter whether 47 is Ron DeSantis or Pete Buttigieg, anyone they appoint will be denounced as partisan by the other side?
Wray is a deep statist. What RINOs and Democrats wail, has no bearing on reaity and the truth. Non-partisan oversight Committees
H_Arendt:The FBI top tiers were being managed by Wray – another Trump appointee so obviously a flaming liberal and secret paramour of Hillary Clinton no doubt.
You do realize that no matter whether 47 is Ron DeSantis or Pete Buttigieg, anyone they appoint will be denounced as partisan by the other side?
Wray is a deep statist. What RINOs and Democrats wail, has no bearing on reaity and the truth. Non-partisan oversight Committees
When do the purity tests start?
How can you do oversight when the agency being overseen is free to withhold whatever information they wish? I think the new legislation should also include severe and swift reprisal for oversight committee members leaking legitimately confidential material.
The Congress still maintains the power of the purse for good reason like instances that governmental agencies give them the run around.
another Trump appointee
Wray has been in the DOJ since 2003. They have the same problem the DOD has.
When do the purity tests start?
I’m thinking the D-FBI position we may have been doing wrong all these years. Maybe the job description is out of whack.
I’m thinking the D-FBI position we may have been doing wrong all these years. Maybe the job description is out of whack.
Every head of the FBI in its history has been a Republican. Fix the problem at its source.