Fauci lied, people died

[Call_me_Ishmael]

RanDo

That’s different ya know

[Jezcoe]

@Samm

@Jezcoe

@Camp

They failed to disclose.

See above pane.

Two things

failed to immediately report this result to the agency, as required.

Does not mean that they never disclosed it. They didn’t disclose it in a timely manner. They should be held accountable for that, but that is weak sauce to build a huge conspiracy around especially when they were working on a different virus and were not intending gain of function. The results that they had were by all accounts a surprise.

When they did disclose.

NIH noted in its letter that when the agency reviewed the original EcoHealth grant proposal, it determined the proposed experiments—designed to determine whether certain bat coronaviruses might infect humans—did not meet its definition of so-called gain-of-function (GOF) experiments that can make pathogens more dangerous to humans.

and furthermore.

At the same time, NIH emphasized in a newly released analysis that any viruses being studied at WIV under the grant were too evolutionarily distant from SARS-CoV-2 to have been transformed into it.

That is a weak weak basis to build a huge conspiracy on.

Those are excellent points for Fauci’s defense layers to present at his trial.

There isn’t going to be a trial.

[Jezcoe]

@Samm

@Jezcoe

@Call_me_Ishmael

@Jezcoe

@Call_me_Ishmael

I’ve done research for the government. I know how to hide real intent with research that “appears” to have a different, more acceptable or legal function. Of course they funded gain of function research. It’s naive to think otherwise.

Well rando on the internet claims it… so it must be true.

Got to do better than that.

Here… let me give you my name and details of how we hid the true intent of the research we did under government funding. Sure buddy.

Yep… rando on internet says it is so.

Compelling argument.

Uh … Aren’t you also a “rando on the Internet”?

I am only quoting back what the articles that are printed say.

I am not claiming some sooper sektrit knowledge of how things really work.

[Call_me_Ishmael]

@Jezcoe

@Samm

@Jezcoe

@Call_me_Ishmael

@Jezcoe

@Call_me_Ishmael

I’ve done research for the government. I know how to hide real intent with research that “appears” to have a different, more acceptable or legal function. Of course they funded gain of function research. It’s naive to think otherwise.

Well rando on the internet claims it… so it must be true.

Got to do better than that.

Here… let me give you my name and details of how we hid the true intent of the research we did under government funding. Sure buddy.

Yep… rando on internet says it is so.

Compelling argument.

Uh … Aren’t you also a “rando on the Internet”?

I am only quoting back what the articles that are printed say.

I am not claiming some sooper sektrit knowledge of how things really work.

Its called first hand knowledge. It’s better than any news article. You should consider yourself lucky to have me here.

[Jezcoe]

@Call_me_Ishmael

Its called first hand knowledge. It’s better than any news article. You should consider yourself lucky to have me here.

Which is awesome.

But from a rando on the internet who says so without back up… it is worthless.

[Samm]

@Jezcoe

@Samm

@Jezcoe

@Camp

They failed to disclose.

See above pane.

Two things

failed to immediately report this result to the agency, as required.

Does not mean that they never disclosed it. They didn’t disclose it in a timely manner. They should be held accountable for that, but that is weak sauce to build a huge conspiracy around especially when they were working on a different virus and were not intending gain of function. The results that they had were by all accounts a surprise.

When they did disclose.

NIH noted in its letter that when the agency reviewed the original EcoHealth grant proposal, it determined the proposed experiments—designed to determine whether certain bat coronaviruses might infect humans—did not meet its definition of so-called gain-of-function (GOF) experiments that can make pathogens more dangerous to humans.

and furthermore.

At the same time, NIH emphasized in a newly released analysis that any viruses being studied at WIV under the grant were too evolutionarily distant from SARS-CoV-2 to have been transformed into it.

That is a weak weak basis to build a huge conspiracy on.

Those are excellent points for Fauci’s defense layers to present at his trial.

There isn’t going to be a trial.

Perhaps. After the 2022 elections, all bets are off.

[Samm]

@Jezcoe

@Samm

@Jezcoe

@Call_me_Ishmael

@Jezcoe

@Call_me_Ishmael

I’ve done research for the government. I know how to hide real intent with research that “appears” to have a different, more acceptable or legal function. Of course they funded gain of function research. It’s naive to think otherwise.

Well rando on the internet claims it… so it must be true.

Got to do better than that.

Here… let me give you my name and details of how we hid the true intent of the research we did under government funding. Sure buddy.

Yep… rando on internet says it is so.

Compelling argument.

Uh … Aren’t you also a “rando on the Internet”?

I am only quoting back what the articles that are printed say.

I am not claiming some sooper sektrit knowledge of how things really work.

Of course you are. Playing holier than thou doesn’t get you anywhere amongst your rando Internet peers.

[Samm]

@Jezcoe

@Call_me_Ishmael

Its called first hand knowledge. It’s better than any news article. You should consider yourself lucky to have me here.

Which is awesome.

But from a rando on the internet who says so without back up… it is worthless.

Pot/kettle.

[Jezcoe]

@Samm

@Jezcoe

@Samm

@Jezcoe

@Camp

They failed to disclose.

See above pane.

Two things

failed to immediately report this result to the agency, as required.

Does not mean that they never disclosed it. They didn’t disclose it in a timely manner. They should be held accountable for that, but that is weak sauce to build a huge conspiracy around especially when they were working on a different virus and were not intending gain of function. The results that they had were by all accounts a surprise.

When they did disclose.

NIH noted in its letter that when the agency reviewed the original EcoHealth grant proposal, it determined the proposed experiments—designed to determine whether certain bat coronaviruses might infect humans—did not meet its definition of so-called gain-of-function (GOF) experiments that can make pathogens more dangerous to humans.

and furthermore.

At the same time, NIH emphasized in a newly released analysis that any viruses being studied at WIV under the grant were too evolutionarily distant from SARS-CoV-2 to have been transformed into it.

That is a weak weak basis to build a huge conspiracy on.

Those are excellent points for Fauci’s defense layers to present at his trial.

There isn’t going to be a trial.

Perhaps. After the 2022 elections, all bets are off.

Who is going to charge Fauci and with what crime?

[Jezcoe]

@Samm

Of course you are. Playing holier than thou doesn’t get you anywhere amongst your rando Internet peers.

Nope.

Really. I am reading the articles that others are posting… actually reading them and repeating back what they say.

Then I offer my opinion on what evidence there would be necessary to show that Fauci funded gain of function research that led to SARS-COV-2.

It isn’t even evidence that is unobtainable.

Bring that to the the table and I will happily join all of you in the effort to lock him up.

[Supreme_War_Pig]

@Jezcoe

Who is going to charge Fauci and with what crime?

Oh, I am sure they have pleasant dreams about congressional inquiries.

[Jezcoe]

@Supreme_War_Pig

@Jezcoe

Who is going to charge Fauci and with what crime?

Oh, I am sure they have pleasant dreams about congressional inquiries.

Maybe they can investigate a ton and find an e-mail server and rally around that.

[Samm]

@Jezcoe

Who is going to charge Fauci and with what crime?

Congress … Lying to.

[Jezcoe]

@Samm

@Jezcoe

Who is going to charge Fauci and with what crime?

Congress … Lying to.

He didn’t lie.

The study under question was not gain of function research.

[Samm]

@Jezcoe

@Samm

Of course you are. Playing holier than thou doesn’t get you anywhere amongst your rando Internet peers.

Nope.

Really. I am reading the articles that others are posting… actually reading them and repeating back what they say.

Then I offer my opinion on what evidence there would be necessary to show that Fauci funded gain of function research that led to SARS-COV-2.

It isn’t even evidence that is unobtainable.

Bring that to the the table and I will happily join all of you in the effort to lock him up.

It doesn’t matter what virus Fauci thought he was funding for gain of function study. All funding of gain of function studies was banned by Congress. Therefore, that the Chinese probably hid exactly what they were doing from the NIH and Fauci does not let him off the hook. Right now he has political protection, but that can and likely will, change.

[Samm]

@Jezcoe

@Samm

@Jezcoe

Who is going to charge Fauci and with what crime?

Congress … Lying to.

He didn’t lie.

The study under question was not gain of function research.

He flat out lied. He testified that no funding from the NIH was sent to the Wuhan Lab for gain of function work which undeniably was conducted by the lab.

[Jezcoe]

@Samm

It doesn’t matter what virus Fauci thought he was funding for gain of function study.

When it comes to the idea that he helped to kill millions it does.

@Samm

All funding of gain of function studies was banned by Congress

Which is great. The study in question was not gain of function research.

The rest of your post is a conclusion not based in any facts.

[Jezcoe]

@Samm

@Jezcoe

@Samm

@Jezcoe

Who is going to charge Fauci and with what crime?

Congress … Lying to.

He didn’t lie.

The study under question was not gain of function research.

He flat out lied. He testified that no funding from the NIH was sent to the Wuhan Lab for gain of function work.

I can repeat over and over that the study in question was not gain of function research.

When will it sink in?

[Samm]

@Jezcoe

@Samm

It doesn’t matter what virus Fauci thought he was funding for gain of function study.

When it comes to the idea that he helped to kill millions it does.

@Samm

All funding of gain of function studies was banned by Congress

Which is great. The study in question was not gain of function research.

The rest of your post is a conclusion not based in any facts.

No it doesn’t. What he did was a crime regardless whether anyone died or not.

[Samm]

@Jezcoe

@Samm

@Jezcoe

@Samm

@Jezcoe

Who is going to charge Fauci and with what crime?

Congress … Lying to.

He didn’t lie.

The study under question was not gain of function research.

He flat out lied. He testified that no funding from the NIH was sent to the Wuhan Lab for gain of function work.

I can repeat over and over that the study in question was not gain of function research.

When will it sink in?

Yep. You can repeat that as often as you like. It won’t make it true.