Are you being sarcastic??
Not at all.
Then you are not having a serious conversation.
Then you are not having a serious conversation.
I an absolutely serious.
To judge a pandemic you of course will judge by % and per population.
100 people in a city of 200,000 is not bad.
100 people in a town of 110 people is a massive issue.
By all measurement (minus the ones you are making up in your head) the 2nd wave of the pandemic hit Red States harder…
Take whatever conclusion you want from that but it is a fact that the numbers bare out.
3 out of 5 yesterday.
Texas
4 out of 4
I didn’t include Hidalgo County, they didn’t report yesterday for some reason.
To judge a pandemic you of course will judge by % and per population.
No.
I can use any metric I want. And the cries all this time have been new cases and deaths.
Trump didn’t kill % per 100,000, he killed 250,000.
“We have 1/4th of the world’s population and 7/8ths of the world’s cases!”
Now you want to “adjust”? No.
What are you rambling about?
Trump didn’t kill anyone. His mishandling of the virus lead to a higher death count of over 250,000
And yes, your quote (we have 1/4the population and 7/8th of the cases) reflects per population.
Again, I understand you are serious
So was my kid when he was 4 when he told me he could survive a plane crash by jumping up right before he hit the ground
But you are both so wrong all I can do is laugh.
Now do CA and FL
Last month? How many people have tested positive in the last month?
None that I’ve been in contact with.
Positive rate is a metric of testing, not spread. It is also a lagging indicator. All it estimates is if you are doing sufficient testing.
That’s not true at all.
Well -Lets review. Lets go Blue state vs Red State on this 2nd wave of Covid infection.(Not sure what the link preview in Hannity community. If you click it, it takes you to a state to state list of % positive).
States ranked by COVID-19 test positivity ratesI count 2 Dem Gov vs 8 Republican Gov in the top 10.
Top 10
Idaho: 52.2 percent positive
New daily cases: 805
Tests per 100,000: 153.8South Dakota: 49.7
New daily cases: 687
Tests per 100,000: 197.8Kansas: 46.6
New daily cases: 1
Tests per 100,000: 160.7Iowa: 39.6
New daily cases: 1,306
Tests per 100,000: 138.6Pennsylvania: 36.4
New daily cases: 7,465
Tests per 100,000: 193.1Alabama: 34.7
New daily cases: 2,288
Tests per 100,000: 190.3Arizona: 28.5
New daily cases: 5,376
Tests per 100,000: 263.3Mississippi: 27.2
New daily cases: 1,473
Tests per 100,000: 231.7Utah: 20.5
New daily cases: 2,563
Tests per 100,000: 468.8Missouri: 19.2
New daily cases: 3,832
Tests per 100,000: 320.5Bottom 10 - I count 8 Dem Gov and 2 Republican Gov (And the 2 Republican Gov’s are Never Trumpers who followed CDC guidelines.)
Maryland: 6.6
New daily cases: 2,643
Tests per 100,000: 668.9Washington: 6.3
New daily cases: 1,654
Tests per 100,000: 449.3Connecticut: 5.7
New daily cases: 0
Tests per 100,000: 1,071.8*Connecticut has not reported new cases since Dec. 4.
Massachusetts: 5.3
New daily cases: 4,827
Tests per 100,000: 1,241.2New York: 4.9
New daily cases: 9,702
Tests per 100,000: 970.9Washington, D.C.: 3.8
New daily cases: 264
Tests per 100,000: 896.5Maine: 2.5
New daily cases: 221
Tests per 100,000: 771.7Vermont: 2.4
New daily cases: 121
Tests per 100,000: 751.2Hawaii: 1.9
New daily cases: 104
Tests per 100,000: 368.7Oregon: 1
New daily cases: 1,253
Tests per 100,000: 3,547.3
For a real comparison from state to state, see the John’s Hopkins records of new cases per 100,000 population.
I don’t know your source, but John’s Hopkins shows something very different.
BTW, what happened to California?
Track Testing Trends - Johns Hopkins Coronavirus Resource Center (jhu.edu)
New cases per 100,000
California: 73
NY 50
Alabama 47
Kansas .03
Updated Dec 7
Trump didn’t kill anyone. His mishandling of the virus lead to a higher death count of over 250,000
And yes, your quote (we have 1/4the population and 7/8th of the cases) reflects per population.
No it doesn’t. It’s not “adjusted”
Again, I understand you are serious
So was my kid when he was 4 when he told me he could survive a plane crash by jumping up right before he hit the ground
But you are both so wrong all I can do is laugh.
Nice one. I’ll take the high road here.
WuWei:Positive rate is a metric of testing, not spread. It is also a lagging indicator. All it estimates is if you are doing sufficient testing.
That’s not true at all.
It is absolutely true. 100%
What about it? Call has three times as Fla with only two times the population. Cal has some parts on lockdown while Fla doesn’t.
WuWei:Last month? How many people have tested positive in the last month?
None that I’ve been in contact with.
You have no idea who you have been in contact with or what their status is.
Which just drives people indoors to breathe together.
Don’t understand that move/request/suggestion/order???
What about it? Call has three times as Fla with only two times the population. Cal has some parts on lockdown while Fla doesn’t.
Texas has twice as many cases and still doesn’t have as many deaths.
My governor is twice as good as Cuomo.
Which just drives people indoors to breathe together.
Don’t understand that move/request/suggestion/order???
I don’t think they can dine in either.
Nothing is being adjusted.
If the US has 1/4 the population the expected cases would be 1/4th if the cases.
To compare different places (cities, states, countries) you would use a metric to account.
Are you claiming that if a state has 100,000 people and 10 cases they are doing better then the state with 500,000 people and 30 cases??