Sure did.
Maybe you just didn’t like the answer.
Or understand it.
Sure did.
Maybe you just didn’t like the answer.
Or understand it.
Okay.
https://www.justice.gov/sco/press-release/file/1433511/download
Perhaps you can show us that language.
Okay what?
The claim is being made that this is bad for Clinton… she has yet to be named in any indictment.
There is no claim that the campaign or Clinton has committed any crime.
Sure did.
Maybe you just didn’t like the answer.
Or understand it.
No, you didn’t. I am still waiting for an explanation as to why you think this will be “bad” for Hillary Clinton.
Are you still holding out hope?
https://www.justice.gov/sco/press-release/file/1433511/download
Perhaps you can show us that language.
Will this do?
“Mr. Durham branded the entire group under the heading of “co-conspirators” — a tag he did not apply in the original September 2021 indictment.”
Washington’s best inside look at how determined Hillary Clinton campaign operatives conspired to bring down former President Donald Trump is contained in the expanded writings of John Durham.
Okay what?
The claim is being made that this is bad for Clinton… she has yet to be named in any indictment.
There is no claim that the campaign or Clinton has committed any crime.
Okay.
You’re right.
sussman and clinton and her campaign aren’t in any way connected.
My mistake.
Will this do?
Not really. What do you think this means?
No, you didn’t. I am still waiting for an explanation as to why you think this will be “bad” for Hillary Clinton.
Are you still holding out hope?
I don’t know what I was thinking. It’s like I’m not even paying attention.
It’s like I haven’t seen the dossier and the alpha bank hoaxes completely dismantled, and it’s 2017 and the “russian collusion” narrative rules the day.
You guys are so smart.
I’m relying on the dummie republucan lawyer who went to toothpaste college to know what he’s doing.
How stupid of me.
Not really. What do you think this means?
Heads I win, tails you lose.
I don’t know what I was thinking. It’s like I’m not even paying attention.
It’s like I haven’t seen the dossier and the alpha bank hoaxes completely dismantled, and it’s 2017 and the “russian collusion” narrative rules the day.
You guys are so smart.
I’m relying on the dummie republucan lawyer who went to toothpaste college to know what he’s doing.
How stupid.
I really hope you’re not actually “relying” on Durham - hes not going to give you what you so desperately want.
Sussmann might be convicted of lying to Baker, and get a fine or probation. But that’s it.
Heads I win, tails you lose.
You really believe that you and I have skin in this game?
I really hope you’re not actually “relying” on Durham - hes not going to give you what you so desperately want.
Sussmann might be convicted of lying to Baker, and get a fine or probation. But that’s it.
You guys are so smart.
I should mention that i never read the indictment.
Or the dossier.
Or the mueller report.
A few short weeks ago you guys were saying durham couldn’t prove the lie. Now youre saying…
Sussmann might be convicted of lying to Baker, and get a fine or probation. But that’s it.
I like where I’m at.
Jezcoe:Okay what?
The claim is being made that this is bad for Clinton… she has yet to be named in any indictment.
There is no claim that the campaign or Clinton has committed any crime.
Okay.
You’re right.
sussman and clinton and her campaign aren’t in any way connected.
My mistake.
Are those connections being explored in this trial?
Is anything with the Clinton Campaign being charged in relation to Sussman?
You really believe that you and I have skin in this game?
Not literally.
But you seem to have something invested in proving your legal acumen.
Good luck.
Are those connections being explored in this trial?
Is anything with the Clinton Campaign being charged in relation to Sussman?
Okay.
You guys are so smart.
I should mention that i never read the indictment.
Or the dossier.
Or the mueller report.
I’m sure you haven’t.
A few short weeks ago you guys were saying durham couldn’t prove the lie. Now youre saying…
I have never said that Durham couldn’t prove the lie. I have been very consistent in my opinion that Sussmann might be convicted.
The problem, of course, is that you guys are convinced that this is the start of something, rather than the end.
The problem, of course, is that you guys are convinced that this is the start of something, rather than the end.
That is exactly it.
Three years of investigation and we get two lame indictments about lying to the FBI.
I’m sure you haven’t.
So what. I knew it was garbage from the beginning. I’ve now been proven right.
You guys spent years devoted to the lies perpetrated in the dossier.
I have never said that Durham couldn’t prove the lie. I have been very consistent in my opinion that Sussmann might be convicted.
The problem, of course, is that you guys are convinced that this is the start of something, rather than the end.
Yeah, the stupid toothpaste college lawyer wasted all this time on sussman’s lie.
If it wasn’t such a stupid opinion I’d have a hard time believing you believe it.(see dossier)
That is exactly it.
Three years of investigation and we get two lame indictments about lying to the FBI.
I thought you guys were all over people lying to the fbi?? (flynn, papadopolous)
Was I wrong about that??
Stupid toothpaste college lawyer strikes again.