Drip, Drip, Drip...... Now Let's Connect Them?

When are you gonna answer my question??

Did the “client” (fusion gps) hire the attorneys, or did the attorneys (perkins coie) hire the client??

Once again, doesn’t the client usually hire the attorney??

This is not hard to answer.

And i think the word you’re looking for is “contractor”.

Yet according to marc elias’ testimony, they never had any kind of a contract or agreement in place.

Perkins Coie hired Fusion GPS.

Sussman was not working on behalf of Fusion GPS.

So we’re finally in agreement that clients are the ones that hire attorneys, and in this instamce the attorneys (perkins coie) hired the contractor (fusion gps).

Good. Glad we settled that.

Sorry about my poorly worded question in the previous post (#3005).

So is he incompetent or corrupt IYO?

…and today, hopefully the first of many trials begin…drip, drip, drip…

Here’s a small preview of the proceedings.

Neither, I think. I think he took a gamble on playing games, and lost.

And here is a review of laura seago’s appearance in the alfa bank vs fusion gps matter where she refused to testify even after the judge compelled her to do so (TWICE).

:rofl:

You guys really are the gift that keeps on giving.

How exactly will this be bad for Hillary Clinton?

1 Like

They think that this trial is going to blow the whole thing wide open.

Most of what they want to hear is not going to be brought up at this trial because the grand conspiracy is not charged.

2 Likes

Her campaign lawyer is on trial.

You didn’t know that?

What is he on trial for?

Again - why is that “bad for her?”

If Sussmann is convicted of lying to Baker, how will that affect her?

Lying to the fbi about the contrived, concocted dirt her campaign bought and paid for.

1 Like

Is there any charge anywhere in any indictment that this was done at the direction of Hilary Clinton or the Campaign?

He’s already under oath saying he shopped the dirt around on behalf of his client.

His client was hillary clinton.

2 Likes

…and?

You haven’t answered the question.

I believe there’s something in there about a “broader conspiracy”, or language to that effect.

Has there been a charge to that effect?

Is Durham going to be able to bring it up during this trial?