I think the Alabama vote was like 60/40 in 2000.
Which direction do you think it’s gone since, in Alabama? Probably the same? It’d be a lot closer than you think. It’d be just a little awkward.
Supreme Irony!
Look at all the prog males supporting women’s rights not to obligate them. Warms the heart.
2 Likes
Good news on location? Sure
Good news that congressers are telling Americans to treat SCOTUS decisions as illegitimate? Not good news.
Ha, yes, very important caveat (in Thomas’ mind).
People get a little riled up when their rights are taken away.
But not on a certain sixth of January…
1 Like
Good thing there is no right to an abortion then.
2 Likes
Yep
Bonkers
1 Like
[Public Service Announcement]
NOTE: TO THOSE THAT WILL ASSIST WOMEN TRAVELING ACROSS STATE LINES
If your state attempts to make it illegal to travel, or assist someone with travel, to another state for an abortion either as a criminal offense or by opening you up to civil punishment by being sued.
There is good news.
Just have the person by a firearm in the new state, doesn’t have to be expensive - a basic .22 caliber rifle can be had for less than $200.
By traveling to buy a firearm or to assist a person with buying a firearm, you will be good to go.
WW
[/Public Service Announcement]
3 Likes
Yes, and also when they lose elections, but it doesn’t justify decapitating institutions over it.
Well, that’s the thing. There was, until this morning.
3 Likes
Doubt she even understands what a “big” word like that means.
1 Like
I think certain forms of contraception and out of state travel will be the next battleground.
If we truly believe that life begins at conception, it naturally follows that concraception is a goner.
But I cannot for the life of me figure out how they could block interstate travel.
When the view is that the institution has been corrupted by partisan ■■■■■■■■ what is the correct response?
The power of the institutions derive from the belief that that are in service to the people.
What if that goes away?
I just hope this is enough of a win for the anti-abortion crowd but something tells me they will overplay their hand to the detriment of everyone especially women.
It’s typically in good form to specify female hormonal contraception which can prevent implantation of the fertilized egg after conception.
Condoms & Rhythm Method are forms of contraception that don’t fall into that problem area.
WW
who says the health of women is now at stake? what about all those pregnant men who will have to go to New York or California?
1 Like
I guess you haven’t see the section form the Thomas concurrence that Griswold (contraception), Lawrence (sodomy), and Obergefell (same sex civil marriage) were also erroneous decisions.
Of course he left out the Loving (interracial civil marriage) from his list, even though it was based on the same Constitutional principal.
WW
1 Like
