Dobbs watch thread (Row v Wade Overturned)

[thinkingman]

wow. looks like someone doesn’t like outcome

there’s that word again - “illegitimate”

not bad for a mere bartender

Drew Hernandez

[zantax]

@thinkingman

wow. looks like someone doesn’t like outcome

there’s that word again - “illegitimate”

not bad for a mere bartender

https://mobile.twitter.com/DrewHLive/status/1540359953914937349?ref_src=twsrc^tfw|twcamp^tweetembed|twterm^1540359953914937349|twgr^|twcon^s1_&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fcitizenfreepress.com%2Fbreaking%2Faoc-encourages-violent-insurrection-outside-supreme-court%2F

Save that, it will come in handy when republicans retake congress if this, scratch that, when this turns violent.

[WorldWatcher]

.
.
.
Is it me, or did Thomas forget to mention the “Loving” Decision?

WW

[Jezcoe]

@WorldWatcher

.
.
.
Is it me, or did Thomas forget to mention the “Loving” Decision?

WW

Looks like it.

[WuWei]

Immoral panic. Bonkers.

Are any of us truly free if a woman has to be responsible for her decisions? Wild.

[zantax]

Does it matter? No state is going to outlaw interracial marriage now even if they could.

[TheDoctorIsIn]

@zantax

Save that, it will come in handy when republicans retake congress if this, scratch that, when this turns violent.

There’s no doubt there will be violence tonight.

But I don’t think it will be quite as politically helpful to the GOP as you think it will be.

[Jezcoe]

Here is the coming battle.

Attorney General Garland says states can't ban FDA-approved abortion pills on...

[Zander]

@zantax

@margaretms2

Here’s another win for the right—seriously, no sarcasm. https://www.pewresearch.org/politics/2022/02/02/publics-views-of-supreme-court-turned-more-negative-before-news-of-breyers-retirement/pp_22-02-02_views-of-scotus_00-01/

We don’t decide constitutional issues with popularity contests.

Yes, we know, that grave responsibility falls to googled law review articles.

[WuWei]

Now California and New York can permit abortion up to crowning.

[Jezcoe]

@TheDoctorIsIn

@zantax

Save that, it will come in handy when republicans retake congress if this, scratch that, when this turns violent.

There’s no doubt there will be violence tonight.

But I don’t think it will be quite as politically helpful to the GOP as you think it will be.

This was Mexico City in September over abortion rights.

We aren’t there yet.

[Zander]

That’s really, really dumb on her part.

Just giving her people what they want. Zero thought for the consequences (ignoring SCOTUS decisions).

[Sknyluv]

@WuWei

Immoral panic. Bonkers.

Are any of us truly free if a woman has to be responsible for her decisions? Wild.

Take away a women’s ability to make their own healthcare decisions, and then blame them for not being responsible.

[WuWei]

He’s wrong.

[Jezcoe]

@Zander

That’s really, really dumb on her part.

Just giving her people what they want. Zero thought for the consequences (ignoring SCOTUS decisions).

Good news.

Now that the decision has been made the whole thing about protesting at judges houses to change the decision goes away.

[Zander]

Thomas’ rationale would be that Loving was based on equal protection (not just substantive due process), and even under substantive due process, (traditional) marriage is one of those “historical rights” that the Court will recognize.

[TheDoctorIsIn]

DC, now:

Manu Raju

[Zander]

@WuWei

Immoral panic. Bonkers.

Are any of us truly free if a woman has to be responsible for her decisions? Wild.

Is any one of us truly free if we can’t have a Twitter account?

We can get wild all day every day with both sides’ histrionic pout fests.

[Jezcoe]

@Zander

Thomas’ rationale would be that Loving was based on equal protection (not just substantive due process), and even under substantive due process, (traditional) marriage is one of those “historical rights” that the Court will recognize.

So can rationalize…. Good on him.

[Sknyluv]

@Zander

Thomas’ rationale would be that Loving was based on equal protection (not just substantive due process), and even under substantive due process, (traditional) marriage is one of those “historical rights” that the Court will recognize.

But just for straight people.