Do We, As US Citizens, Have A Right

That’s not what the Constitution says. It’s posted above.

Sorry, but it just doesn’t work that way. Federal laws trump state’s every time. Right now fully automatic guns made after 1986 (I think) are straight up illegal and non transferable.

You, if you get caught with it.

Not hardly.

The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects

:rofl: You just referenced a violation of the Constitution to justify a violation of the Constitution.

They are transferable. If I have a …

Come on man.

Can you quote where in Constitution that gives goverment that authority?

1 Like

Why did you stop on effects?

The right of the people to be secure in their persons , houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures,

Against unreasonable search and seizure.

Not being allowed to start a business where you want, how you want, when you want is not an unreasonable search, nor is it an unreasonable seizure.

Then it would state between foreign nations, states and the people.

Now you’re just making things up.

Forcing me to report, register or otherwise account for my personal purchases is a search involving a 3rd party and I am no longer secure.

Same exact logic used by the court to justify a “right to privacy” for the purposes of murdering babies.

2 Likes

10th amendment . . . Few posts after the one you quoted. Zoning and most business regulation not designated to the Federal Gov, and not prevented by the constitution. So reserved to the states and the people.

That’s interesting…now the expect Montana to prevent guns from leaving the state but when it comes to pot growers…those states that allow that don’t have to prevent pot from leaving the state.

Can we stay double standards. :wink:

4 Likes

I have a right to be secure in my person, houses, papers and effects.

Montana rifles. The state of Montana is in on it.

What is the purpose of zoning?

Against unreasonable search and seizure. You are leaving that part off.

Yes. There is FAR too much regulation limiting our ability to engage in private activity. If I don’t pose a threat to others, i.e. am I making fertilizer in my garage that could explode and kill my neighbors or damage the water supply… there should be NO regulations on your activity. To me, the line is harming others. No harm, no regulations. JMO of course and I know that will never fly because people seem to want the nanny state.

It is a search.

You do understand there are places that I cannot turn my garage into a small workshop.

Now I live in unincorporated area precisely their isn’t any restrictions.

If the full auto gun is lawfully owned (requiring a Class III license), and made before May 19, 1986 then it can be legally transferred.