The whole rationale behind the Montana rifles thing is that the government can’t regulate them as long as they are manufactured IN and STAY in Montana. The second one of those guns crosses the state line, whether by sale or some knucklehead forgetting it’s in his trunk, it would then fall under federal regulations.
Like I said earlier. Unless there are strict records of sales, and very strict punishments for illegal sales, somebody WILL sell those things at a huge profit.
I would argue that this is the same argument folks make about immigration. Some folks immigrate legally, some sneak across the border. Conservatives say that they need to do it right and get in line with everyone else.
So let’s use this Conservative logic here. Folks who followed the rules, got business licenses and are now running tanning bed businesses did it the right way and if you want to run one out of your garage you need to do it right and get in line with everyone else.
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the states, are reserved to the states respectively, or to the people.
Is the power of zoning delegated to the United States Federal Government by the Constitution?
Is the power of zoning prohibited by the states in the constitution?
Under the 10th amendment zoning is reserved to the states or the people.
As such, people elected LOCAL and STATE representatives (people and the state) and decided they had the power to enact zoning. It’s not restricted by the constitution that they can do it, and it’s not deligated to the Federal Government.
Now show me some place in the constitution that zoning violates please and thank you.
What regs? Why not the “regs” of the states I cross while I’m crossing them?
The 2nd Amendment is incorporated against the states. So what regs? According to the Constitution as incorporated by the SCOTUS, I can bear that rifle in any state in the union and it shall not be infringed, so what regs?
