The whole rationale behind the Montana rifles thing is that the government can’t regulate them as long as they are manufactured IN and STAY in Montana. The second one of those guns crosses the state line, whether by sale or some knucklehead forgetting it’s in his trunk, it would then fall under federal regulations.
WuWei
64
“Allowing”? Quote the section of the Constitution that “allows” the government to stop me.
1 Like
WuWei
65
Well, that’s all wrong. I deal with OSHA weekly.
WuWei
67
Where does the commerce clause mention citizen, individual or any such language? It doesn’t.
Take a break.
1 Like

WuWei:
How do they have to?
Like I said earlier. Unless there are strict records of sales, and very strict punishments for illegal sales, somebody WILL sell those things at a huge profit.
Are you a citizen of your state?
I would argue that this is the same argument folks make about immigration. Some folks immigrate legally, some sneak across the border. Conservatives say that they need to do it right and get in line with everyone else.
So let’s use this Conservative logic here. Folks who followed the rules, got business licenses and are now running tanning bed businesses did it the right way and if you want to run one out of your garage you need to do it right and get in line with everyone else.
2 Likes
WuWei
71

SpacemanSpiff:

WuWei:

SpacemanSpiff:
The Montana rifles thing is an interesting case study. If any materials used in their manufacture cross state lines the Fed could use that to step in. Also, what kinds of purchase records are gonna be kept? I know the knee jerk answer is “Absolutely none!”, but that brings about another problem. Somebody from out of state is gonna offer a Montana citizen $5000 for a $2000 rifle. With no records of purchases that’s just easy money, baby. Eventually one of those guns will be found out of state and in come the Feds.
What difference does either make? How does either affect anybody other than the buyer and seller.
Why was the commerce clause included in the Constitution? To control a Montana man from selling me a rifle to take to Texas?
The whole rationale behind the Montana rifles thing is that the government can’t regulate them as long as they are manufactured IN and STAY in Montana. The second one of those guns crosses the state line, whether by sale or some knucklehead forgetting it’s in his trunk, it would then fall under federal regulations.
I know what the government’s excuse is. If that happens, you due process the individual violator, you don’t prohibit everyone who didn’t.
Why does the rifle I bring to Texas not fall under Texas regulations?
WuWei
72

toreyj01:
I would argue that this is the same argument folks make about immigration. Some folks immigrate legally, some sneak across the border. Conservatives say that they need to do it right and get in line with everyone else.
So let’s use this Conservative logic here. Folks who followed the rules, got business licenses and are now running tanning bed businesses did it the right way and if you want to run one out of your garage you need to do it right and get in line with everyone else.
I disagree that it is “right”. I disagree that government has the authority to determine what “right” is.
Do people have the authority to determine what “right” is?
WuWei
74
So what? Who does it hurt if I agree to pay $5k for a $2k rifle?

WuWei:

SpacemanSpiff:

WuWei:

SpacemanSpiff:
The Montana rifles thing is an interesting case study. If any materials used in their manufacture cross state lines the Fed could use that to step in. Also, what kinds of purchase records are gonna be kept? I know the knee jerk answer is “Absolutely none!”, but that brings about another problem. Somebody from out of state is gonna offer a Montana citizen $5000 for a $2000 rifle. With no records of purchases that’s just easy money, baby. Eventually one of those guns will be found out of state and in come the Feds.
What difference does either make? How does either affect anybody other than the buyer and seller.
Why was the commerce clause included in the Constitution? To control a Montana man from selling me a rifle to take to Texas?
The whole rationale behind the Montana rifles thing is that the government can’t regulate them as long as they are manufactured IN and STAY in Montana. The second one of those guns crosses the state line, whether by sale or some knucklehead forgetting it’s in his trunk, it would then fall under federal regulations.
I know what the government’s excuse is. If that happens, you due process the individual violator, you don’t prohibit everyone who didn’t.
Why does the rifle I bring to Texas not fall under Texas regulations?
It absolutely would. But since the gun has crossed state lines it’s under federal regs now, too.
Snow96
76
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the states, are reserved to the states respectively, or to the people.
Is the power of zoning delegated to the United States Federal Government by the Constitution?
Is the power of zoning prohibited by the states in the constitution?
Under the 10th amendment zoning is reserved to the states or the people.
As such, people elected LOCAL and STATE representatives (people and the state) and decided they had the power to enact zoning. It’s not restricted by the constitution that they can do it, and it’s not deligated to the Federal Government.
Now show me some place in the constitution that zoning violates please and thank you.
Nobody, as long as you don’t leave Montana with it.
Snow96
78

WuWei:
How do they have to?
Feds regulate interstate comerece. If a prodect is going to cross state lines, then the Federal Govnernment can regulate it.
Very few things can be guaranteed not to cross state lines.
WuWei
79
Why?
What regs? Why not the “regs” of the states I cross while I’m crossing them?
The 2nd Amendment is incorporated against the states. So what regs? According to the Constitution as incorporated by the SCOTUS, I can bear that rifle in any state in the union and it shall not be infringed, so what regs?
WuWei
80
The right of the people peaceably to assemble
WuWei
81
Who does it hurt if I do?
Snow96
82
Huge stretch counting comerace as assembly.