The case against Twitter definitely gets dismissed under Sec. 230 of the Communications Decency Act, which makes Twitter immune from suit for defamation. The question of the posters must be the topic of an analysis by the Court of whether the statements are satire, opinion or capable of defamatory meaning. It seems like they are either straight commentary on news stories or satirical commentary. If that is the case, then you don’t even get to the question of truth. As a public figure, even if the statements are false, he would have to prove that the posters knew they were false. I suspect this doesn’t go anywhere.
Great…then you’ll know all of the auctions I attend on EST time that allows me to buy vehicles from sellers who don’t know what they have…until the rest of the world wakes up and then…it’s too late. I own em.
There seems to be zero critical thought behind many of the analogs put forth beyond, “something I don’t like happened to someone I like so I’ll throw that out. That’ll learn ‘em.”
Wait. Maybe you’re on to something here actually. We have millions of Americans who are no longer tethered to objective reality because of their allowance of the CEC thinking for them and using propaganda to drive their emotions, which in turn drives their actions.