Bureaucrats believe their policies apply to anybody other than them.
3 Likes
More to the point may be, the Constitution has been made a suggestion by those entrusted to support and defend it.
1 Like
YeahâŚso where is accountability?
2 Likes
The wronged parties have standing to sue. Class action too though not sure if thatâs applicable to violations of civil rights.
Incorrect. You might want to look at Montana gun laws.
The FBI and justice department thanks you for your continued ignorance.
You think they are just gonna turn their records to them for a lawsuit. Heâll they wonât even go e them to congress.
7 Likes
Well lets hope soâŚbut there needs to be punishment for bureaucrats that is responsible.
Oh edit to add. Doesnât change the fact that democrats have become the party of censorship.
2 Likes
Ok i am honestly not knowledgeable of all the gun laws out there but like i said some laws are unnecessary due to the protections offered by the bill of rights. And the constitution. The gay marriage law is similarly unnecessary
What do you mean for a lawsuit? The Twitter files are sufficient to file a lawsuit by any wronged parties for the violation of their civil rights. I would argue they would be helpful in surviving any motion for failure to state a claim.
I have no love for the fbi as has been shown by my countless posts on the subject. All i am saying is that firstly it is unnecessary and secondly this law would not hit the house floor if the gop thought it had a chance of passing. What supports my opinion is that they have not been screaming about this law from every roof top. The hill wrote about it and it got picked up by a few blogs. But there is no massive media blitz. At least not yesterday when i looked. May be that has changed.
I donât disagree with the last part. I absolutely abhor my side of aisle shifting towards censorship. Corporate censorship as well as political censorship.
2 Likes
Montana rifles is a commerce clause law.
1 Like
Thank you.
this one for instance.
If the DOJ refuses to hand over anything what can be done? This law could put the threat of jail time behind it. Not just some money from the government, opps our bad.
I would say it shouldnât be but wonât say it is not.
Oh but civilians have been screaming about it. Maybe someone is listening.
4 Likes
3 Likes
Itâs time to start punishing those entrusted with power to support and defend our constitution but use their power to subjugate the very constitution they took an oath to support and defend.
4 Likes
Right because the political wonks were the target of the useless vote.
If the doj refuses to hand anything over a motion can be made to disclose. The motion to force the disclosure can be taken all the way to the âconservativeâ Supreme Court.
Does the law make it a criminal act?
How much dat is?
Yeah thatâs the problem. With the left refusing to protect civil rights in some cases there is nothing to financially back these lawsuits. I was thinking about that when i was posting. Itâs a problem. The aclu needs to wake the bleep up.
Itâs another good argument for the necessity of the law.
Glad we could agree. Running around yelling âSue them! You can sue them!â doesnât do much good, does it?
4 Likes
Are we going to pretend the ACLU is just temporarily off course?
3 Likes
We are not. Thatâs why i used the word refusing. Itâs intentional.
Though i did say wake up. Thatâs on me. Itâs intentional
