When a illegal entrant parent is held in criminal detention for violating our law, their child is handed over to the Department of Health and Human Services until the child can be released to a family member, or placed in foster care. This is essentially the same thing which happens a citizen of the United States, who has a child, breaks our law and is locked up. The child is placed under the care of the state. THAT IS DUE PROCESS MY FRIEND.
My goodness. You make a lot of assertions, and offer nothing of substance.
So now you are back to suggesting that foreigners who enter our country illegally with their children and are separated and detained as the law provides have a civil action, but the children of convicts who are put in state facilities and separated from their parents while their parents do their prison time can not sue?
Only the insane thinking of an ACLU shyster lawyer can rationalize such an absurdity.
If you are going to make a reference to a court’s decision, post a link to the decision.
America law provides for the criminal detention of illegal entrants. If an illegal entrant is accompanied by their child during apprehension and detention, the child is placed under the care of Department of Health and Human Services, and there is nothing illegal or unconstitutional about doing so. Are you suggesting the child should be released into our population without a parent or family member to take care of them?
And where in the ruling does the court say it is unconstitutional for an illegal entrant to be put in criminal detention, and their child not be placed with the Department of Health and Human Services?
I am not arguing. I asked you a question about the case you cite: where in the ruling does the court say it is unconstitutional for an illegal entrant to be put in criminal detention, and their child not be placed with the Department of Health and Human Services?
My goodness. You make a lot of assertions, and offer nothing of substance.
So now you are back to suggesting that foreigners who enter our country illegally with their children and are separated and detained as the law provides have a civil action, but the children of convicts who are put in state facilities and separated from their parents while their parents do their prison time can not sue?
Only the insane thinking of an ACLU shyster lawyer can rationalize such an absurdity.
Now, how does the case you cite suggest it is illegal to place an illegal entrant in criminal detention, and place the illegal entrant’s child with the Department of Health and Human Services?
The judge ruled that there was no due process afforded to the people who had their children taken away and it caused them harm.
The Trump Administration did not fight this ruling and ended the child separation policy.
Because it was ruled that their rights were violated they were able to sue and a judge ruled that the US Government needs to work out some sort of reparations.
That is what happened … in this reality… on this planet.
All the other stuff you are saying just doesn’t matter.
The fact is, it is not unconstitutional or illegal, or a violation of due process, to place an illegal entrant in criminal detention, and place the illegal entrant’s child with the Department of Health and Human Services.
Only the insane thinking of an ACLU shyster lawyer can rationalize that millions of illegal entrants are due reparations
And they’re totally clueless as to why millions of them are streaming to get here by any means possible. After all, no one is coming here for the free healthcare TJ promised them, or the free education…
Advance to the United States illegally, collect 450,000 dollars.
Sounds like a Monopoly Chance card, except Libs have made it a new reality.
The ruling you cited has nothing to do with the constitutionality of placing an illegal entrant’s child in the custody of the Department of Health and Human Services while the illegal entrant is held in criminal detention.
Don’t give them more ideas. They’re already woke-ing Monopoly:
From the article:
“Covering topics like beauty contests, holiday funds, and life insurance, there is no denying the Monopoly game’s Community Chest Cards are long overdue for a refresh,” Hasbro said in a press release. “And, coming out of the tumultuous year of 2020, the term ‘community’ has taken on a whole new meaning.”
So, the “Second place in a beauty contest” card could switch to “shop local.” Other options for the new cards include “Rescue a puppy” and “Help your neighbors clean up their yard after a storm.”
