silly suit. It doesn’t matter whether anyone reported on fraud they did not believe was true. The first amendment does not require the press to believe what they print/say.
what matters is what was said to defame dominion with knowledge that the specific statements about dominion were false.
Nope. We have 4 years of prime time network coverage of Russian collusion. That really happened. I know you’d like to sweep it under the rug, but too bad.
As are the majority of our digital world that we are ignoring.
Shining a light on this will play well to the public. That’s why the AZ audit wanted “the routers”, etc… and why cyber-ninja was on the job.
There is not an electronic or digital product in existence that is not riddled with potential to exploit. Particularly if you grant yourself physical acces and perfect ability to execute.
No “algorithms to swing elections”, just high margin buggy systems that fall down do to incomplete engineering and the inherent nature of modern electronic systems.
Wow! Shocking! A news outlet that believes in free speech had staff with strongly differing opinions on Trump and claims of Dominion massaging the vote counts. Differences of opinion among the parts is not proof that the whole (Fox) knew one side was correct.
The fallacy of composition is an informal fallacy that arises when one infers that something is true of the whole from the fact that it is true of some part of the whole. A trivial example might be: “This tire is made of rubber, therefore the vehicle of which it is a part is also made of rubber.” Wikipedia
Or "Carlson and Hannity strongly disbelieved accusations against Dominion, therefore Fox knew the accusations were false.