I defend rights, not bigots, so that post was that which I would expect from an ignorant wretch. Not you of course.
So some groups are more worthy of rights than others? How do I determine the worthy?
I defend rights, not bigots, so that post was that which I would expect from an ignorant wretch. Not you of course.
So some groups are more worthy of rights than others? How do I determine the worthy?
WuWei:Get the law to violate their rights? No, I think I’ll have to pass on that one.
New legislation wouldn’t remove their bigotry. They’d still have the right to fear whoever they want.
So what would it achieve then?
You’re a hero, thank you for your service. lol
I can only hope to one day reach your level of heroism.
It takes a lot to proudly defend bigots and mock sick children.
Congratulations.
So funny how conservatives are the biggest victims from the media, big tech, colleges and everybody else and like to sue for their “equal” rights but defend this ■■■■■■■■ as a first amendment right
Excast:If only groups who are actually worthy of some assistance had that same level of passion from you.
That’s funny
If the bi-racial homosexual o w n e r refuses service on their property to Joseph and Mary, I’m your defender.
I wouldn’t know. I was busy hoping they’d go out of business while you fainted around the room trying to make me feeeeel the way you do.
You do this to yourself. lol
SixFoot:You’re a hero, thank you for your service. lol
I can only hope to one day reach your level of heroism.
It takes a lot to proudly defend bigots and mock sick children.
Congratulations.
Better?
So there’s a church out there that preaches it’s attendees that Jesus doesn’t want them to do commerce with “certain people” or “certain mixes” of people. Fascinating.
This will probably be a good way to grow their Church.
It takes a lot to proudly defend bigots and mock sick children.
It’s not easy to defend the rights of The Unworthy. You didn’t think that through.
Big difference. It is crazy that in this day and age you deny services based on the color of the skin. No one should be denied because the couple is of different races.
However if one believes that the act of homosexuality is a sin, and that marriage is only between a man and a woman, even if the government says otherwise, they should not be forced to host something what recognizing what they say is a sin.
However the thing on race is ridiculous and would never defend that racist outlook.
Why is it different?
Big difference. It is crazy that in this day and age you deny services based on the color of the skin. No one should be denied because the couple is of different races.
However if one believes that the act of homosexuality is a sin, and that marriage is only between a man and a woman, even if the government says otherwise, they should not be forced to host something what recognizing what they say is a sin.
However the thing on race is ridiculous and would never defend that racist outlook.
What is the difference?
However if one believes that the act of homosexuality is a sin, and that marriage is only between a man and a woman, even if the government says otherwise, they should not be forced to host something what recognizing what they say is a sin.
They already tried to use religion as a reason to discriminate against blacks
Maybe one day the brave conservative men will actually live up to their hero fantasies and defend someone other than the worst among us.
However if one believes that the act of homosexuality is a sin, and that marriage is only between a man and a woman, even if the government says otherwise, they should not be forced to host something what recognizing what they say is a sin.
Maybe hotels wont rent rooms to people that aren’t married for fear of hosting a sin
Maybe one day the brave conservative men will actually live up to their hero fantasies and defend someone other than the worst among us.
Who could need their rights defended more than the worst among us?
Why do The Worthy need defending at all?
matt1618:However if one believes that the act of homosexuality is a sin, and that marriage is only between a man and a woman, even if the government says otherwise, they should not be forced to host something what recognizing what they say is a sin.
Maybe hotels wont rent rooms to people that aren’t married for fear of hosting a sin
O w n e r decides.
I’m third generation Mexican American, I have 6 siblings only one of them married a fellow Mexican American, and that ended in divorce, I and my other siblings who married, married whites, it is ridiculous to think that there is a venue that would have not hosted any of us.
I’m third generation Mexican American, I have 6 siblings only one of them married a fellow Mexican American, and that ended in divorce, I and my other siblings who married, married whites, it is ridiculous to think that there is a venue that would have not hosted any of us.
Why?
…
thinkingman:to draw attention to their cause
What “cause” would that be? Loving someone who is a slightly different shade than you are?
what does that have to do with that owner’s establishment?