That’s what these new laws are based on, as shown by my links.
Glad we agree.
Are you seriously gonna deny that happened? 
Are you seriously going to use Letters to the Editor as your proof?
You are pro cashless bail. Welcome to the club.
So what is your ■■■■■■■ point? Bring up with the lawyer who disagrees and thinks we are just afraid.
Are you seriously gonna deny it happened? It was on every news channel for a week them flipping off the press when they were released. Trying to gaslight us is standard for you when caught lying.
Do you need more links to prove you where lying?
1 Like
Why are you so nasty and combative?
You said this:
Which makes people think you are AGAINST cashless bail.
Then you throw in some insults along the way.
All of this leads me to believe you are AGAINST cashless bail.
Lo and behold you are for it.
So great - we agree - cashless bail is good.
Swell.
1 Like
What a stupid response typical of you.
No I am not for cashless bail. Why don’t you stop being a parrot and go up and read what I posted. Yes I am nasty to people who continue to lie and and try and gaslight people when they know you are wrong.
I showed you the language of the laws. You show me post and fox headlines.
Show me a law that says people accused of violent offenses are released with no bail.
And what’s with the ■■■■■■■ liar accusations?
I am familiar with several of these laws and they DO NOT allow no bail for violent crime accusations. If I missed one, it’s called a mistake, not a lie.
■■■?
We just go around calling people liars all day around here now?
1 Like
You don’t remember how that all worked out, do you?
All of them were given bail - $15,000 cash, or $50,000 bond.
And the one who flipped off the press - the one who made all you guys the most mad - he was exonerated.
1 Like
I don’t have to show you law I showed you it happening. You claimed it didn’t.
Why are you so insulting and nasty to other guests at this forum?
1 Like
Then can you explain this exchange, because it sure sounds like you are for cashless bail.
That was only one.
Because just like I think it should be painfull for rich people it should be for poor. Cashless is not painful. Yes some innocent get caught up in it. That should painful for the city when proven.
This is a political discussion board. People aren’t lying. We’re discussing a topic. Sometimes people get the facts wrong - you haven’t shown that here - but no one is lying.
1 Like
Your reputation is well earned. You will never convince anyone on here you didn’t know about that case.
1 Like
I thought we weren’t supposed to be nasty to other posters on these forums. Is that not a thing?
/edit
Uh. Ok. Dude literally said he’s nasty to people and I was just checking. Y’all gonna do what you want but I was just asking.
1 Like
No, they all got bail.
Except for the handful that were released due to lack of evidence against them, and the middle-finger guy who was just straight up not there.
1 Like
