No it wasn’t. You can’t claim moral high ground when you are pro something like that. It was used to show his hypocrisy. Wasn’t used as a pivot to a different subject.
Defendants with a serious risk of danger or flight can be detained pending trial.
NY:
Notably, the legislation authorized judges to set bail in many cases “involving harm to an identifiable person or property” if committed while released after being charged with a similar offense.
CA:
Today the Superior Court of Los Angeles County approved a new set of bail schedules that include safe and fair Pre-Arraignment Release Protocols which determine release status based on an arrestees’ risk to public or victim safety and their likelihood of returning to court while reducing reliance on money bail as a condition of release for many of those arrested in Los Angeles County for non-violent, non-serious felonies and misdemeanors, Presiding Judge Samantha P. Jessner announced.
Do you have an example of a state letting violent offenders free with no bail?
I understand that you don’t quite get, so I’ll spell it out for you.
He raised the issue of “killing babies” (i.e. abortion) to, by his own words, demonstrate hypocrisy.
That’s why I asked about the Palestinian babies. A lot of them are being killed right now in case you weren’t aware. A lot of the MAGAs don’t really seem to care, not to the extent that they’re actually willing to do something about it. Some might call that hypocritical.
Yeah. True, innocent people are in prison (not jail - jail is where you go before you are sentenced). We should work to correct that, don’t you think?
Also true, people who can’t afford bail and who are charged with misdemeanors often end up spending months in jail and this becomes life altering as they lose their jobs, and homes because they were charged with minor offenses. We should work to correct that, don’t you think?
Thanks for proving me correct. They are trying to reform their system to get what you say. Here is an example of why your original statement was a lie.