Crime: Explained in a way even liberals can understand (I hope)

Why not? That is the absolute core of the problem.

1 Like

Because they have democrat counties. Oh, and they actually have cops who report crimes.

Republican governors have no control over Dem ran counties?

Tusculosa AL is Republican ran… higher crime rate than Montgomery AL… which is Dem ran.

The best method to lowering poverty is for those that have sex and bring a child into the world, unitedly and lovingly guide that child into adulthood along the path of education. The fact this is NOT being done, is the NUMBER ONE REASON for the poverty they must now endure for the balance of their lives.

I don’t miss the dealing with creepy stalkers part, so I thank you for y’all’s service. :rofl:

1 Like

I already told you the answer. What is the single largest factor in these children’s financial outcome? Do people just carelessly and irresponsibly ■■■■ or do they love each other, are married, working together unitedly to have a better life for themselves and their potential offspring? The outcome is mostly determined during one, single moment in time…

Other than San Diego, I can’t think of any large cities in the U.S. that aren’t crime-infested cesspools. Are there any others?

That’s a post all about feelings. Good on ya

My feelings are right on the money. Bow to my intuition. :sunglasses:

Top 10 cities’ violent crime rates per 100K (FBI statistics):

  1. New York - 538.9
  2. Los Angeles - 761.3
  3. Chicago - 1098.86
  4. Houston - 1095.23
  5. Phoenix - 760.93
  6. Philadelphia - 947.58
  7. San Antonio - 707.5
  8. San Diego - 366.61
  9. Dallas - 774.64
  10. Jacksonville - 631.32

That’s just the top 10. I wonder if San Diego might be safest in the top 30, 40…

Yes there is crime where there are people. What makes it a cesspool. New York is a city of 9m people

It’s not the total number of crimes but rather the rate of violent crimes per 100K that makes them cesspools. That said, NYC is only half the cesspool that Chicago and Houston are.

Incorrect. Nearly all the areas with high crime are blue areas run by democrats. These areas are not run by governors or the state police. They are run by lib mayors, lib council, lib police chiefs. Didn’t I already explain that?

Red states have the highest crime rates.

Are you saying governors have no control over their own state crime?

It doesn’t work.

Look at the demographics and where the crime happens.

Yes it does.

Doesn’t matter. On their watch.

Where does the buck stop?

No, it doesn’t. It has never worked. Especially not with my people. Look at the NFL.

Your mistake is you have been indoctrinated to believe men commit crimes because they are poor-it’s not true.

They aren’t stealing food.

With the culture that permits and even promotes the culture. And parents.

Can a governor relocate populations? A strategic hamlet program might work.

I understand that.

I wonder if NYC is in the ranking at the top of safest big cities.