Putting aside your description of it as “arbitrary,” yes they do.
That’s exactly how a common-law system works.
Well, there has - that’s exactly what the Colorado court determined.
Interesting theory…if the border isn’t open how exactly are we on our way to blowing away old border crossing records. Why are border patrol agents going to be stuck in the office on Christmas Day … not patrolling the border but stuck in their office processing this crush of migrants.
Your theory is interesting…ridiculous and totally out of touch…but interesting.
No, they don’t.
How is it not arbitrary?
1 Like
Prove it.
More people are coming to the border than ever before because they all think it’s open due to Republicans sky screaming “open borders!1!!1”
Can you name a single difference between Obamas border policy and Biden’s? Yet they had vastly different numbers.
This is not a border thread.
Sorry. My auto correct went a bit haywire and I didn’t notice.
“They don’t have the power to declare crimes were committed outside their jurisdiction either.”
If they were, Trump would have been extradited back to where the crime WAS committed to face trial.
1 Like
democratic party.
Allan
1 Like
That is not proof. That is an opinion based on … nothing.
1 Like
Outside their jurisdiction. Can’t declare a crime happened somewhere else they don’t have jurisdiction
Well…that’s not exactly what they’re doing.
1 Like
It is proof that the Colorado court legally determined an insurrection took place, and that Trump engaged in it.
We’ll see. I will concede they have tried. What they haven’t done is explain the basis for their opinion.
1 Like
No, they definitely explained the basis for their decision, too.
It’s quite a long and in-depth opinion.
Does it mention fee fees?
1 Like
Well according to court records no J6 defendants have been charged or convicted of “insurrection” so the conversation the wankers on the left are continuing to regurgitate is nothing more than the usual hopes, lies and bull ■■■■■ With the support of the Dimbulbcrats propaganda machine aka the mainstream media, the lies are spreading daily. Since there was no insurrection the basis of the CO decision is based on lies or at a minimum figments of their imagination.
For the record for those still living the 14.3 dream, there were those Confederate supporters, leaders and veterans who were elected to post war US Congress and one individual served as Secretary of the Interior under President Johnson ( Lincoln’s VP)
Look it up, I’m not doing your ■■■■■■■ reasearch.
3 Likes
Got ya… It isn’t that they are making a judgement that a crime was committed… it is that they are saying that Trump engaged in activity that was insurrection and that the Legislature of Colorado has given the court to make the determination to limit the State Primary to Constitutionally qualified candidates.
It’s in their opinion here.
What their appeal was about was if the original judgement that the President may not be a officer of the United States which I think is an absurd “The Card says Moops” argument. What is clear is that Trump did violate his oath of office in attempting to overturn the result of the election that he knew that he had lost and that his attempt led to a violent riot by his supporters at the Capitol in which he did nothing to stop for a couple of hours.
Even if the Colorado court didn’t determine that Trump is ineligible to hold the office… I would hope that the voters would not support an example of UnAmerican Scum like Trump… but I know I am wrong and that they will.
By lib logic.
CHAZ was an actual insurrection.
Idaho could declare the events in Washington an insurrection, and any politician that aided, provided support, or provided cover for the insurrectionists in Washington cannot hold nation wide office.
1 Like
