Also, what were the âpositive thingsâ that were cut off in the conversation about paying to kill the story about his affair with the the playboy bunny? Did it cut off the part where he talks about how much time he spends volunteering at the soup kitchen?
With a straight face, tell me that you would think there was ânothing to talk aboutâ if Obama had had an ongoing affair for a year, then made a secret plan with his lawyer to create a shell company to pay 150 K to hush the story up by getting the National Enquirer to take her story and then hide it- all a couple months before the 2016 election. And that the lawyer taped the conversation because he knew it was incriminating and then âleakedâ it to CNN.
SeriouslyâŚyouâd be like- âAnti-Obama hysteriaââŚâNothing to see here.â
Yes, yes, reads bad⌠you do know, of course, Trump said to release all the tapes? Seems to me, if he was worried, he would be wanting to bury them behind a a years long stream of litigation.
When did Trump say to release all of the tapes? Also, why did he waive attorney-client privilege and leak this specific tape, following it up with sending Giuliani around to boldly lie about what was on the tape? That is what a guilty-conscience does.
Davis, a damage-control maestro going back to the Clinton administration, told me: âMichael Cohen has made a turn. This is on the record â Michael and I talked about it.â
âMichael is going to tell the truth to the powers that be, and let the chips fall where they may.â
âIâve used this line too many times, but who talks about cash like that besides drug dealers and mobsters?â
Davis said that the tapeâs release sends the message: âI am no longer the previous Michael Cohen that you knew â taking a bullet for Donald Trump, saying anything to defend him, being a good soldier. ⌠That is over.â
Lanny Davis and Michael Cohen clearly believe there is much more âtruth to be toldâ by him to the authorities. He was a personal attorney/fixer for Trump for over a decade. He knows things that none of us know, and he is confident enough to tell the public this is the case.
The White House has been littered with womanizing Presidents. With a straight face I can categorically state that I DONâT CARE. I only care about policy results.
MmmmâŚwomanizing is not the main issue hereâŚpaying out 150 large to create a shell company to hide the story a couple months before the election is the story. All while being taped by your personal lawyer who then leaks it to the press. Again John Edwards faced criminal charges and was literally disgraced for this a short 10 years ago.
The key aspect of the John Edwards case is that they couldnât prove that he knew about the 700 K funneled to pay off his mistress Rielle Hunter.
In this case there are literally tapes and likely corroboration by Trumpâs personal attorney that money was funneled for a payoff that was an illegal campaign contribution that was not reported to the FEC. It doesnât look good.
Youâre downplaying the tape and shouting no shot sherlock as if a tape confirming new lies needs to get downplayed, and that only crazy liberals are upset