To blow smoke? No I guess you don’t.
Because they were given a treatment regimen by their Dr and refused by the pharmacist.
Did you really need to ask this?
And why did the pharmacist refuse it? Government.
GWH:She said her patients felt better after they received treatment. You can call it chance, but you don’t know because you’re not her patients or her. So you’re really just blowing smoke. Anecdotal evidence is like that sometimes.
I don’t have to “be her patients or her”.
You, of all people, see what is happening here brother. The divide is growing. Feelings versus facts. Science versus emotion. You can’t win and the slide will continue. This is why I pray daily. It’s terrifying and my only solace has become prayer.
Borgia_dude:Ok. Again, that’s why you won’t know if what you are doing is having a positive effect or not. Keep prescribing those M&Ms.
Unfamiliar with the placebo effect?
Are we not searching for actual remedies?
Obviously those who have never treated a patient are in a far better position to judge whether a treatment is effective or not.
Or something.
JayJay: GWH:She said her patients felt better after they received treatment. You can call it chance, but you don’t know because you’re not her patients or her. So you’re really just blowing smoke. Anecdotal evidence is like that sometimes.
I don’t have to “be her patients or her”.
You, of all people, see what is happening here brother. The divide is growing. Feelings versus facts. Science versus emotion. You can’t win and the slide will continue. This is why I pray daily. It’s terrifying and my only solace has become prayer.
Authoritarian high modernism.
Not within 12 hours of seeing the doctor.
WuWei: Borgia_dude:Ok. Again, that’s why you won’t know if what you are doing is having a positive effect or not. Keep prescribing those M&Ms.
Unfamiliar with the placebo effect?
Are we not searching for actual remedies?
Now it’s remedies? The patient got well?
Emotions have driven the entire response to this virus, mostly fear and unwarranted panic.
Science versus emotion.
What has “science” done to address it? Wash your hands for 20 seconds. Stay 6’ apart. Cough into your sleeve? Where did 20 and 6 come from?
Is this the science that said “36,000 more ventilators in NYC or else!”?
The science that said “Stay inside, it doesn’t like sunlight!”?
The science that said “No motorboats, sail boats are ok”?
There is no “science”. What there is is “scientists” guessing. And they’re losing credibility.
Everything I need to know to mitigate this, I learned in ■■■■■■■ kindergarten. Thanks for the reminder, let’s get back to work.
“Science” is no longer scientific, it is now a political weapon wielded by activists with an agenda.
It doesn’t matter if we’re talking “Climate Change”, Economics, or Medicine, “Science” has been co opted and replaced with an agenda.
It’s terrifying
You can stay inside.
I wasn’t referring to science, I was referring to math.
I wasn’t referring to science, I was referring to math.
Who are you talking to?
“Math” is a science.
DTTB call must have gone out.
You believe in it too.
Good identification of the problem and she makes an excellent case that the panic shutdown was a mistake. I’m disappointed she didn’t offer any thoughts on solutions. Good article, thanks for posting it. It sounds a little like a white paper for higher oil prices…
“Science” didn’t say any of the things other than 6’ and 20 seconds.
The rest was politicians…likely cutting deals.
You believe in it too.
Believe in what?
“Science” didn’t say any of the things other than 6’ and 20 seconds.
The rest was politicians…likely cutting deals.
No? Are you sure?
Science didn’t say ventilators?
Who do you think has their hands up the pols asses making their mouths move?