Right, I treated patients. Is the goal to research or the patient get well? Mine is the latter.
It doesnât really matter what heâs in. The discussion is currently about the Dr.
Thatâs all they can do for virus, treat the symptoms.
Ok. Again, thatâs why you wonât know if what you are doing is having a positive effect or not. Keep prescribing those M&Ms.
If the good doctor want to say her treatment is effective she needs to show it is more than mere chance.
Her patients are satisfied with their care. Thatâs what sheâs worried about.
2 Likes
If she did absolutely nothing, most would be satisfied with her care.
How do you tell the difference between her care being effective beyond chance?
1 Like
No she doesnât.
Doesnât matter. Well matters.
Since most patients donât need it and will recover on their own, how is it patient advocacy?
No they wouldnât.
All results are chance.
She said her patients felt better after they received treatment. You can call it chance, but you donât know because youâre not her patients or her. So youâre really just blowing smoke. Anecdotal evidence is like that sometimes.
1 Like
The doctor and patient want it.
If she wants to be taken seriously, she does. Anyone can say anything.
I donât have to âbe her patients or herâ.
Because they were given a treatment regimen by their Dr and refused by the pharmacist.
Did you really need to ask this?
Most patients feel better over time even if nothing is done.
Unfamiliar with the placebo effect?
She was taken seriously by the people that matter. Her patients. She could probably care less what an anonymous person on the internet says.
2 Likes
They all do. Or they die.
