Chloroquine and Hydroxychloroquine Coronavirus cures?

[WuWei]

@JayJay

@WuWei

@JayJay

No one has said that.

You’re right. “…unless they challenge the narrative.”

All better.

No one has said that either.

“… unless South Korea did it”?

[JayJay]

@WuWei

@JayJay

@WuWei

@JayJay

No one has said that.

You’re right. “…unless they challenge the narrative.”

All better.

No one has said that either.

“… unless South Korea did it”?

Zero for three.

That’s OK, though…Willie Mays went 1 for his first 27 in his career.

There’s hope for you…

[toreyj01]

@WuWei

@toreyj01

@WuWei

@toreyj01

Appears she is a former Dallas County Republican Assembly Chairwoman. Not that it invalidates her speech, her lack of ethics regarding uses of experimental treatments and conspiratorial mongering does that on its own.

This is not how MDs should conduct themselves when discussing medical concerns, she comes off like she is a quack rather than an owner of an established and successful practice, which she has.

So… wrongspeak.

If a Physician wants to educate people about potential therapies it is a rare thing they stand in the middle of a square with a bullhorn. Call it what you will.

Wrongspeak.

Dumbspeak. She is within her rights to go off label and treat her patients as she sees fit. But to stand in some square with a bullhorn and tell people that other Doctors are not treating their patients as they should by following standard treatments is irresponsible and smacks of politicization rather than patient advocacy.

Recovery from COVID is rather common, there are bad cases to be sure but the overwhelming number of patients who contract COVID recover with simple supportive care. And that supportive care doesn’t carry the risk of sudden cardiac death. Again, if a Doctor wants to try novel approaches or off label meds, as long as the patient is aware of the risks have at it.

But intimating that standard approaches are inferior is a falsity until it is proven to be so. Randomized controlled trials are needed to shift HCQ from off label to standard of care.

There is an old saying in medicine that I think of when I see folks take HCQ for COVID…

“If you take antibiotics for a cold, the cold goes away in 7 days, but if you don’t take antibiotics the cold will go away in a week”.

[WuWei]

@toreyj01

But intimating that standard approaches are inferior is a falsity

Is it? How we doing with them?

[Borgia_dude]

@WuWei

@sikofit

@WuWei

@sikofit

@Smyrna

She even says that

…she’s a political activist. I thought that was baaaaaad?

She has a lab coat and a stethoscope. I that was gooood?

In the video she comes right out and calls herself a political activist. I was told on here that we should consider political activists comments on a subject as being biased

In the video she comes right out and calls herself a doctor treating COVID patients. I was told on here that we should consider doctor’s comments on a subject as coming from a burning bush.

Does the good doctor not understand the difference between anecdote and data? Do you?

[WuWei]

@Borgia_dude

@WuWei

@sikofit

@WuWei

@sikofit

@Smyrna

She even says that

…she’s a political activist. I thought that was baaaaaad?

She has a lab coat and a stethoscope. I that was gooood?

In the video she comes right out and calls herself a political activist. I was told on here that we should consider political activists comments on a subject as being biased

In the video she comes right out and calls herself a doctor treating COVID patients. I was told on here that we should consider doctor’s comments on a subject as coming from a burning bush.

Does the good doctor not understand the difference between anecdote and data? Do you?

Of course I do. Her patients are data.

[RTchoke]

@WuWei

@sikofit

@WuWei

@sikofit

@Smyrna

She even says that

…she’s a political activist. I thought that was baaaaaad?

She has a lab coat and a stethoscope. I that was gooood?

In the video she comes right out and calls herself a political activist. I was told on here that we should consider political activists comments on a subject as being biased

In the video she comes right out and calls herself a doctor treating COVID patients. I was told on here that we should consider doctor’s comments on a subject as coming from a burning bush.

[WuWei]

I thought that said “Red-headed Librarian”

I’m so disappointed.

[RTchoke]

@WuWei

I thought that said “Red-headed Librarian”

I’m so disappointed.

[JayJay]

@WuWei

@toreyj01

But intimating that standard approaches are inferior is a falsity

Is it? How we doing with them?

Pretty well actually.

85% or so of people who get COVID recover on their own with standard care.

[WuWei]

@JayJay

@WuWei

@toreyj01

But intimating that standard approaches are inferior is a falsity

Is it? How we doing with them?

Pretty well actually.

85% or so of people who get COVID recover on their own with standard care.

You’re taking credit for “at home with no care?”

[sikofit]

@WuWei

@Borgia_dude

@WuWei

@sikofit

@WuWei

@sikofit

@Smyrna

She even says that

…she’s a political activist. I thought that was baaaaaad?

She has a lab coat and a stethoscope. I that was gooood?

In the video she comes right out and calls herself a political activist. I was told on here that we should consider political activists comments on a subject as being biased

In the video she comes right out and calls herself a doctor treating COVID patients. I was told on here that we should consider doctor’s comments on a subject as coming from a burning bush.

Does the good doctor not understand the difference between anecdote and data? Do you?

Of course I do. Her patients are data.

She says in the video that 98% of those with Coronavirus need no treatment at all so Inwonder how many patients she had with Coronavirus and how many she treated with Hydroxychloroquine. If she’s consistent with what she said in her speech it shouldn’t of been more than 1 or 2 given the treatment at most

[JayJay]

@WuWei

@JayJay

@WuWei

@toreyj01

But intimating that standard approaches are inferior is a falsity

Is it? How we doing with them?

Pretty well actually.

85% or so of people who get COVID recover on their own with standard care.

You’re taking credit for “at home with no care?”

No.

What gave you that idea?

[WuWei]

@sikofit

She says in the video that 98% of those with Coronavirus need no treatment at all so Inwonder how many patients she had with Coronavirus and how many she treated with Hydroxychloroquine. If she’s consistent with what she said in her speech it shouldn’t of been more than 1 or 2 given the treatment at most

Ask her.

[WuWei]

@JayJay

@WuWei

@JayJay

@WuWei

@toreyj01

But intimating that standard approaches are inferior is a falsity

Is it? How we doing with them?

Pretty well actually.

85% or so of people who get COVID recover on their own with standard care.

You’re taking credit for “at home with no care?”

No.

What gave you that idea?

That’s the vast majority of patients.

[Borgia_dude]

@WuWei

@JayJay

@WuWei

@JayJay

@WuWei

@toreyj01

But intimating that standard approaches are inferior is a falsity

Is it? How we doing with them?

Pretty well actually.

85% or so of people who get COVID recover on their own with standard care.

You’re taking credit for “at home with no care?”

No.

What gave you that idea?

That’s the vast majority of patients.

Has the good doctor calculated the probability of chance versus efficacy of her treatment?

[WuWei]

@Borgia_dude

@WuWei

@JayJay

@WuWei

@JayJay

@WuWei

@toreyj01

But intimating that standard approaches are inferior is a falsity

Is it? How we doing with them?

Pretty well actually.

85% or so of people who get COVID recover on their own with standard care.

You’re taking credit for “at home with no care?”

No.

What gave you that idea?

That’s the vast majority of patients.

Has the good doctor calculated the probability of chance versus efficacy of her treatment?

What does that matter? They recovered. I don’t care if she gave them peanut M&Ms, they got well.

[GWH]

@toreyj01

smacks of politicization rather than patient advocacy.

Listen again. It’s patient advocacy when the pharmacist won’t fill the scrip.

[Borgia_dude]

@WuWei

@Borgia_dude

@WuWei

@JayJay

@WuWei

@JayJay

@WuWei

@toreyj01

But intimating that standard approaches are inferior is a falsity

Is it? How we doing with them?

Pretty well actually.

85% or so of people who get COVID recover on their own with standard care.

You’re taking credit for “at home with no care?”

No.

What gave you that idea?

That’s the vast majority of patients.

Has the good doctor calculated the probability of chance versus efficacy of her treatment?

What does that matter? They recovered. I don’t care if she gave them peanut M&Ms, they got well.

And that’s why you aren’t in research.

[GWH]

@sikofit

@WuWei

@Borgia_dude

@WuWei

@sikofit

@WuWei

@sikofit

@Smyrna

She even says that

…she’s a political activist. I thought that was baaaaaad?

She has a lab coat and a stethoscope. I that was gooood?

In the video she comes right out and calls herself a political activist. I was told on here that we should consider political activists comments on a subject as being biased

In the video she comes right out and calls herself a doctor treating COVID patients. I was told on here that we should consider doctor’s comments on a subject as coming from a burning bush.

Does the good doctor not understand the difference between anecdote and data? Do you?

Of course I do. Her patients are data.

She says in the video that 98% of those with Coronavirus need no treatment at all so Inwonder how many patients she had with Coronavirus and how many she treated with Hydroxychloroquine. If she’s consistent with what she said in her speech it shouldn’t of been more than 1 or 2 given the treatment at most

Doctors treat to minimize symptoms all the time.