Can't Believe This Sicko is a Sitting Member of Congress, As Well as a 2020 DEMOCRAT Presidential Candidate

[Ben_Natuf]

@NuffSaid

@tnt

@Ben_Natuf

both of whom said clearly that the protest did add to the spikes. Their untested assertions that they didn’t add much are meaningless. What science is included is extremely questionable and appears to be more confirmation bias that actual hard science.

examples:

They conclude it can’t be so because hard hit large metros in the NE have not seen a spike. They do not take into account the higher levels of immunity that would be present in the areas hardest hit early on. That’s hardly scientific. Its barely even rationally anecdotal.

They acknowledge Spikes that correlate to Floyd protests and then dismiss the protests as a major factor based on the first bad assumption. As is 10’s of thousands of people protesting may cause a spark, but 50 people in a bar would cause a forest fire. It’s not even good logic.

Link to epidemiologists claiming Flyod protests caused major upticks in cases?

Don’t waste your time. I’ve asked and was told “look at a map”.
Auto129 proved that the protests didn’t cause spikes in NY, but that will be ignored.

nothing is ignored except the responses. All you have to do to verify that large spikes correlate to Floyd protests is look at a damned map. It doesn’t take a scientist to do that. Anyone with a modecum of common sense can see it.

NY is also easily explained. The virus spread was near 25%, there is a level of immunity there that other places don’t have. Don’t worry though, the anti bodies don’t last long so you should see an increase beginning soon, in fact, its started in NJ already. You guys and your denials of what is plain before your face, and of science you don’t agree with is frankly disturbing, and dangerous.