These are generalizations, so bear that in mind please.
It’s one of the main cultural differences I see between America and Japan - the former’s elevation of the individual and the latter’s elevation of the community. If a young American male has been taught since birth that he’s special, he’s unique, he’s deserving of things just for being him, it breeds anger and resentment when he’s denied them. Most of the time they don’t react violently, but it drives a few to murder. Elliot Rodger is the poster child for this mentality. The kid thought he was handsome, wealthy, well dressed and well connected - so why wasn’t he popular? Why wasn’t he getting sexual attention from females? To him it was an absolute injustice, and it drove him to seek revenge against those who “denied” him his birthright.
You’d be hard pressed to find an individual like that in Japan. They are taught since birth that the group is more important than the individuals who make it up. They don’t have the same sense of self-entitlement as Americans. This isn’t a better or worse mindset, IMO, just different. But I don’t see the same sense of outrage or sense of injustice against outside forces (government, the economy, etc) coming from the Japanese when things don’t go well in their personal lives. Relevant to the topic of mass shootings, Japanese males seem more inclined to simply withdraw from participating in society than to lash out violently against it when they don’t get what they want.
I forgot about that. Maybe a refundable credit is better around $1000.
That 1000 would be a big deal to the dirt poor. Only the people who really want to have a kid would give that up. Those parents are the ones who would likely put in effort to raise their kids properly. It also negates whatever real or imagined incentive there is to have children just to collect benefits.
There’s a lot of truth in this but what are you ignoring?
Instead of the Japanese promoting and elevating “cultural diversity” as an Ideal they go in the exact opposite direction.
Japanese culture is much like ant hill culture where everyone is expected to be uniform and work for the good of the common community with the importance of self being universally frowned upon.
Well that’s completely shortsighted when you look at it from the standpoint of nationalism and not basic human nature. In the right circumstances every human being is capable of great evil. I would think as a Protestant you’d agree.
But young men can benefit from a tax credit, whereas welfare is mostly for women. If a guy knocks a girl up, he’s essentially paying money for her live-in boyfriend to live in the lap of welfare luxury–with no certainty that he will be that boyfriend
Also, it’s generally a pain to get benefits. A tax credit is automatic and essentially effort-free.