Michigan has a procedure in place for errors like this. If the other counties had issues, they will be caught and fixed.
3 Likes
Twenty days in Michigan
1 Like
Yes, Republicans in Michigan are certainly asking those questions:
Meanwhile, in Oakland County, Michigan, another computer glitch was uncovered which gave an upset win to Democrat Melanie Hartman. Once it was fixed, her win was nullified and incumbent Adam Kochenderfer was declared the winner.
“Apparently, there was a technical glitch in Rochester Hills. And so, I actually ended up winning by a little over 1,100 votes,” said Kochenderfer. According to the Free Press, “The margin was 1,127 votes, to be exact. That gave him a 51.67% share of the total (with 48.23% going to his opponent, Hartman).”
“I’m very grateful to the officials who caught the error, but we need to ensure that we catch these issues, or prevent them entirely,” Kochenderfer added.
1 Like
“Human error.” Yeah, that’s what you said in the official 2020 election thread. 
Did you read your links?
J. Alex Halderman, a professor of computer science and engineering at the University of Michigan and an expert on voting machines and security, said he is interested in getting more information about what happened.
“It’s plausibly human error, but if a simple screw-up could cause these problems, that sounds like a technical design flaw,” Halderman said.
“It’s natural to wonder whether similar problems could have occurred in other jurisdictions that use the same machine. Fortunately, even if the county hadn’t noticed, this would have been caught and corrected during Michigan’s normal canvassing procedures, when they compare the results to the paper tapes from the machines.”
This isn’t voter fraud though…
Human error? Then what is it? Reallocating ballots to the “right” person who “deserved” them?
The article mentions human error as a possible cause. Humans in the transfer of ballot data from one machine to another. Do you think Dems work that job in a dark red county?
It is pretty shady. This is why the Democrats have the reputation among the right that they do.
People make mistakes. That’s why checks and balances exist, to catch said mistakes.
Oh! How did I know a new conspiracy theory was bound to pop up?
Someone should send link to Trump so that his administration can look into this!
5 Likes
No wonder Oakland County has turned blue. Cheating
I wonder why Macomb County is going fully Republican. Must be their good ideas.
If it’s technical issue no…but question remain why does it seem every time a technically issue comes up it usually in democrat favor.
It’s like those unexplained missing socks.
2 Likes
Cause you keep leaving them all over the place?
So much for moving on from Trump…keep clinging
Hey, reading is what the lizard people want you to do. 
Yes, there was the earlier 138000-vote error for Biden that was a “typo”.
1 Like
Don’t you want fair and accurate election?
3 Likes
You didn’t read the article did you? The typo was from one media outlet.
So where did the error begin? According to several eagle-eyed data hounds, the mistaken material was not from any official state voting site, but on the media site DecisionDeskHQ, which compiles real time election data.
Among those who spotted the error quickly was Ian Goldstein, who says he participates in political betting and prediction markets and uses the name @ENGOLD. He says DecisionDeskHQ, in posting results from Shiawassee County, plugged in the number 153,710 for Biden instead of the accurate 15,371. As a result, Biden’s total quickly ballooned not only in the county tally, but also in the statewide tally.
1 Like
"Our ruling: False
The sudden increase in a vote for Biden stemmed from an error apparently by a media vote collection site in transferring data from a county site. The site briefly increased Biden’s total, but corrected the error within 15 minutes. We rate the claim that these votes “magically” showed up, and was somehow fraud, as FALSE, based on our research."
Happy now?
1 Like
Say it with me…
Trump LOST by A L O T.
6 Likes
