TBH, I find outrage over Russia attacking us in this fashion to be disingenuous hypocrisy. We should be outraged at the craptastic job our government did re: prevention.
âif the president had NOT committed a crime, we would have said soâ
Kelby:Made it clear however, that his office couldnât charge Trump with anything and therefore did not.
He did not say that at all. You made that up. He said that he could not charge him. He did not claim to have a single shred of evidence to charge him with anything. That simply was not said.
Read the report. He did.
Is this what Rush said? Or Sean?
Just curious because what you typed was not what Robert Mueller said.
hindsight:Russia attacked us. Where is the outrage from the Trump-lovers?
TBH, I find outrage over Russia attacking us in this fashion to be disingenuous hypocrisy. We should be outraged at the craptastic job our government did re: prevention.
Lol, more outrage at the US government than the Russian government. Amazing.
âIf we had confidence the president clearly did not commit a crime, we would have said so. We did not.â
What is this saying?
Yes, But that means nothing. The prosecution is obligated to prove that a crime was committed. The defense is not obligated to prove innocence. Everything he said, is already in the report.
hindsight:Russia attacked us. Where is the outrage from the Trump-lovers?
TBH, I find outrage over Russia attacking us in this fashion to be disingenuous hypocrisy. We should be outraged at the craptastic job our government did re: prevention.
And is still not doing.
âBy regulation the SC was bound by DOJ department policy. Charging the President with a crime was therefore NOT AN OPTION WE COULD CONSIDER. â
BOOM!
Mueller was bound by justice department rules.
Then he stated he had FULL authority to charge any co-conspirators (as laid out in the report there would have been many) yet not a single indictment for it. Why would that be?
Is this what Rush said? Or Sean?
Just curious because what you typed was not what Robert Mueller said.
Not to worry. If I quote someone else I will give them credit.
Lol, more outrage at the US government than the Russian government. Amazing.
Well, yeah. Our own government has been guilty of far worse when it comes to its attempts to influence the governance of other nations. Outrage at Russia without outrage at ourselves is the very definition of hypocrisy.
And is still not doing.
Indeed. And thatâs what matters most.
Lol, more outrage at the US government than the Russian government. Amazing.
I think itâs both⌠we can be outraged at Russia and our government for not doing anything to prevent the next attack.
hindsight:Russia attacked us. Where is the outrage from the Trump-lovers?
TBH, I find outrage over Russia attacking us in this fashion to be disingenuous hypocrisy. We should be outraged at the craptastic job our government did re: prevention.
Very should be raging that the Trump government is doing almost nothing to address it.
If you canât even keep track after ten minutes, give it up. Now go get a transcript and study it.
âWe did not, however, make a determination as to whether the President did commit a crime.â
âWe determined that we would not reach a determination one way or the otherâ
Somehow, some are interpreting this as saying we knew he was guilty but we couldnât indict. No. Its just not there.
âIf we had confidence the president clearly did not commit a crime, we would have said so. We did not.â
What is this saying?
Right after he gave the âInnocent until convictedâ speal at the first. So after what he said at the first, Mueller should PRESUME Trump innocent correct? So why would have have to clear him?
Lol, more outrage at the US government than the Russian government. Amazing.
I donât demand integrity from the Russian government. Why would I?
Mueller made it clear that the people have been lying about his report and the dems should start impeachment hearings.
How many times on fox have I heard â if there was obstruction mueller would have charged himâ
A lot.
Cynic:âBy regulation the SC was bound by DOJ department policy. Charging the President with a crime was therefore NOT AN OPTION WE COULD CONSIDER. â
BOOM!
biggestal99:Mueller was bound by justice department rules.
Then he stated he had FULL authority to charge any co-conspirators (as laid out in the report there would have been many) yet not a single indictment for it. Why would that be?
Gee, maybe the President is in charge of the government branch responsible for the investigation?
Very should be raging that the Trump government is doing almost nothing to address it.
Precisely. We did next to nothing to prevent it when we became aware of it and weâre still doing nothing, now. That should upset people.
Yeah and? Looking out for the best interests of oneâs countryâs is almost always a hypocritical position to take.