You’re going down the wrong road when you’re giving away military surplus equipment to police department all across our country.
You say you’re strong pro second Amendment supporter but yet you’re supplying equipment that will no doubt be used against em. It may not be your administration intent but mark my words. Lib authoritarians are going to thank you some day for supplying the very equipment needed for them to achieve their desired end aim.
Left-wing prosecutor? How many prosecutors have you met? You’ll find that if they aren’t conservative, they’re often considering a switch to the defense side. But if you google hard enough, you’ll find some.
This whole “left-wing authoritarians want a militarized police” gimmick won’t stick to the wall.
I’ve heard this same comment 12 years ago when I tried warning Conservatives about the Patriot act and the new tools to eavesdrop/collecting information…that it will be more likely be used against them then intended target.
So do you respect the rule of law or not? He was, indeed, in violation of the law, but prosecutorial discretion was shown and he was not charged.
Also, it wasn’t even 5…the man himself described it as “3-4” police cars. Not only that, but he stated that the “undersheriff” didn’t want to take him in, but the sheriff did.
So your story isn’t entirely complete.
If we want smaller government and states rights, then we have to respect when a state creates a law we don’t like, as long as it adheres to the constitution.
About a year ago I read an article that said that there were some police departments that determined that getting the equipment was not worth the cost of maintenance versus utilization.
My relatives in law enforcement have been telling me for years that local PDs have been slowly turning into a para military branch of the govt since the Battle of North Hollywood back in 1997. Aint putting the toothpaste back in the tube on this one.