Are you guys really OK with this?

[PurpnGold]

@GWH

No, he’s doing just fine with the current format. I mean look at the ratings.

Should he be talking about TV ratings during a pandemic?

[GWH]

Why are you justifying them cutting away from our president during this crisis?

[WuWei]

@PurpnGold

@WuWei

It’s easy to understand why the media hates our President - he made them irrelevant.

Hasn’t Trump also touted that he helps their ratings? Is the NYTimes failing?

They can’t control the narrative. They are relegated to purveyors of confirmation bias support.

[PurpnGold]

@GWH

Why are you justifying them cutting away from our president during this crisis?

Our President is the reason why… remove him and the ratings would remain the same AND we get the right information out.

Trump adds nothing for people who care for the truth

[GWH]

So the man the people voted into office shouldn’t address the nation during this crisis? Is this another cover for China thing?

[WuWei]

@PurpnGold

remove him

well, you tried that.

[Rodeo]

@PurpnGold

What do ratings have to do with that

Well

Gee

Maybe it means

People are watching…

I dunno just spitballing but…

Yeah

[PurpnGold]

@WuWei

They can’t control the narrative. They are relegated to purveyors of confirmation bias support.

What narrative? How would you know if it is or isn’t working (controlling the narrative)?

How can a newspaper be a purveyor of confirmation bias… isn’t that up to the reader?

[PurpnGold]

@Rodeo

Well

Gee

Maybe it means

People are watching…

I dunno just spitballing but…

Yeah

Why is comparing ratings right now important? It adds nothing.

People would be watching regardless. We are in a pandemic right now. Trump hasn’t added anything to that. He has actually said things that make him look silly (I knew all along)

[sikofit]

@Camp

Trump is saving as many of the 2.2 million projected deaths as is possible.

I am with him.

Huh? It was the stste governors who instituted the social distancing measures not trump.

[GWH]

There’s always a narrative. Do you think tanking the ratings of Coronavirus information dissemination will make Coronavirus go away? Or do you think less people will get pertinent information and it will really hurt Trump?

[Rodeo]

[/quote]

well, you tried that
[/quote]

A massive waste of time that coincidentally overlapped the beginning of COVID19.

Golly what would have happened in DC without that dumb distraction???

[PurpnGold]

@GWH

There’s always a narrative. Do you think tanking the ratings of Coronavirus information dissemination will make Coronavirus go away?

Nope.

Does touting ratings make it go away? Or give it more awareness?

@GWH

Or do you think less people will get pertinent information and it will really hurt Trump?

Trump is always a victim.

[WuWei]

@PurpnGold

@WuWei

They can’t control the narrative. They are relegated to purveyors of confirmation bias support.

What narrative? How would you know if it is or isn’t working (controlling the narrative)?

How can a newspaper be a purveyor of confirmation bias… isn’t that up to the reader?

The Narrative. Because he goes direct to the people.

support, confirmation bias support

[WuWei]

@Rodeo

Golly what would have happened in DC without that dumb distraction???

The same thing that happened with it.

[GWH]

If less people are watching the briefings from the Coronavirus task force, will they be more informed or less informed?

If the President of the United States doesn’t think it’s important enough to address personally, is it really all that important?

Does the left want less people to watch? Or do they just want to be able to say that the President isn’t taking it seriously?

If more people get Coronavirus as a result of networks snubbing Trump, will it be worth it if he’s voted out of office? Because I think he’s too involved to quit conducting the briefings, and they exact their pound of political flesh by trashing him for not taking this crisis seriously.

What ever will they do?

[ImRightYoureWrong]

@PurpnGold

Trump is always a victim.

Always

[WuWei]

@PurpnGold

Trump is always a victim.

No, he’s not. And that’s another thing that aggravates the ■■■■ out of the media and libs. Not only does he not take it like he should, he strikes back all out of proportion.

[GWH]

@PurpnGold

Trump is always a victim.

The people listening to your media are the victims.

[ImRightYoureWrong]

@GWH

If less people are watching the briefings from the Coronavirus task force, will they be more informed or less informed?

If the President of the United States doesn’t think it’s important enough to address personally, is it really all that important?

Does the left want less people to watch? Or do they just want to be able to say that the President isn’t taking it seriously?

If more people get Coronavirus as a result of networks snubbing Trump, will it be worth it if he’s voted out of office? Because I think he’s too involved to quit conducting the briefings, and they exact their pound of political flesh by trashing him for not taking this crisis seriously.

What ever will they do?

What are you on about? The POTUS just treated and bragged about it like it’s a sitcom. He’s a ■■■■■■■ ■■■■■ end of story