This paragraph is completely untrue, ignoring ~40 comments in your own thread that refute it; do you enjoy embarrassing yourself like this, acting like some weird robot that ignores everyone and keeps spamming the same post?
1 Like
What post was I responding to? It was the one that said the wall was Donaldās Moby Dick. My comment is a play on the first three words of Herman Melvilleās novel, even though if weāre being technical Donald would more accurately be linked to Captain Ahab in this particular scenario, and not Ishmael.
Apologies if this confused you in any way whatsoever. You have a Happy Christmas and a prosperous New Year. 
They have offered a homeland security appropriations bill that includesā¦
ā¦wait for itā¦
ā¦$1.3 billion for border fencing.
Youāre entire thread is built on a complete falsehood.
2 Likes
A question cannot be a falsehood. It can only be a question. How about this one?
Hey Chucky, Before Trump, you were in favor of an enhanced physical barrier to protect our southern border. Are you still in favor? If not then why?
The answer is yes, he has offered over a billion in funding for border fencing/physical barriers. No need to ask him. Educate yourself.
2 Likes
Republicans missed a golden opportunity when they took a knee for Donald in 2016. Heās certainly branded the party as his own.
2 Likes
/thread
/ā ā ā ā ā ā ā
/over
1 Like
How about this:
Wait for itā¦ā¦ā¦
Hey Chucky, how much barrier can be built with 1.3 billion? What do you hope to accomplish with such a tiny piece of fence, wall, barrier or what ever you choose to call it.
Thatās optimistic.
1 Like
]Call it what you will. But Chuck is opposed to any physical barrier now. Before he was in favor. Why?
So youāre wrong about both Schumer being for Trumpās wall and youāre also wrong about him being āopposed to any physical barrier.ā The Democratsā proposal that they offered Trump includes . . . wait for it . . . funding for fencing and physical barriers.
How hard to you have to try to create a thread based on comically false premises to make arguments this bad? Donāt answer. Itās a rhetorical question. 
5 Likes
Straight from the horseās mouth on December 6th:
Now there has been some confusion about that figure. Let me be clear: the $1.6 billion cannot be used to construct any part of President Trumpās 30-foot-tall concrete border wall. It can only be used for fencing, using technology currently deployed at the border, and only where the experts say fencing is appropriate and makes sense as a security feature. This is something Democrats have always been for ā smart, effective, appropriate border security.
So I even underestimated it. It was $1.6 billion.
Hey, look! There go the goal posts!
Bye, Felicia!
Yeah. We missed a golden opportunity to have elected someone who would not have created the best economy in the history of the U.S. Youāre a funny guy Blackie. 
Faster and better worded, too. Damn you adroit. Do you have to be so gosh darn . . . . adroit all the time?
1 Like
By what metric, the national debt?
To be honest. I do like my original question better. Iām just trying to phrase it in a way that does not make yāall hysterical. Itās seems that yāall just donāt want Chucky to be embarrassed. I get that.
Bye, Lakisha!
What fantasy world do you live in. By what metric, ANY, can you call this the best economy in the history of the US? Seriously, I can rattle off a few off the top of my head where thatās demonstrably false:
GDP growth
Jobs created
Stock Market growth
Real median wage growth
Unemployment rate
1 Like
He ā ā ā ā ā ā ā destroyed your OP on the Senate floor on December 6th.
Itās more of a question than an OP. He destroyed my question? Funny, because I have yet to hear anyone ask him the question.
