And just like that, Birtherism is back

That’s not birtherism.

Yeah, to pay them.

No need to deflect anything.

The only mention in your article.

Harris has used the stops to raise broader discussions of her agenda for African-Americans. When asked, the senator said she is in favor of some form of reparations. “We have got to recognize, back to that earlier point, people aren’t starting out on the same base in terms of their ability to succeed,” she said. “So, we have got to recognize that and give people a lift up.”

What’s your point? Is she asking personally for reparations? Is she specifically asking for reparations? Does “give people a lift up” mean monetary reparations?

So far, Harris has said nothing of the sort.

INSKEEP: Reparations could be mental health treatment for African-Americans, hypothetically.

HARRIS: I think reparations - yeah. I think that the word, the term reparations, it means different things to different people. But what I mean by it is that we need to study the effects of generations of discrimination and institutional racism and determine what can be done, in terms of intervention, to correct course.

The only thing remotely close to monetary reparations is her Lift Act, but that has no race requirements. Anyone meeting the income requirements would benefit.

So, when she is advocating reparations for herself and others in no uncertain terms, there can be a discussion. Right now it’s a talking point without merit.

1 Like

Only reason why cons hate her is because she is not an older white male.

1 Like

Like Gropin’ Joe and Feel the Bern?

She’s black. She’s african american. Been said multiple times in the thread now that there is no distinction.

Does she qualify for reparations??

You continue to ask a hypothetical question about something I don’t care for. Why do you expect an answer when there is none?

So hypothetically, you mean to tell me they’re gonna leave some black, african Americans off of the list??

On what could they possibly base such a decision??

Don’t be so sure that there is going to be a list.
When we passed reparations for Japanese internment, while individual payments were what passes, it was a close decision between that and some museum/educational type thing

Do you think all African-Americans are descendants of American Slaves? Such incredible thinking. How do you get it done?

There is something made quite apparent by you from my first days here on this forum. Want to know what it is?

I said no such thing.

So you’re saying that there is a distinction to be made?? This is something that many other posters above have made clear that there is no distinction.

You may want to talk to them.

Neither will win the nomination.

Interesting. Who is going to win?

On your side Trump of course.

On your side?

Non-hypothetically, this is no list. There are no reparations. Until there comes a time when either are certain, I don’t care. I might not even care then.

Lol. Oh lordy!

Why is the color of her skin even being discussed. It is irrelevant? This should be a policy debate.

In other words, you know she wouldn’t qualify for reparations. You know why she wouldn’t. You realize there’s a distinction. And you don’t want to admit it.

I read you loud and clear.