Unquestionably. Many of them are simply useful tools of people with an agenda that is not in the interest of the country or the public at large. Some with an agenda more nefarious than others. Some simply with an agenda of profiteering off of the marks.
1 Like
You have to admire the effort that went into it.
1 Like
No and ive never heard anyone suggest otherwise
You were saying something about lashing out? lol…
Seriously, tell us the post in this thread (must have been between 2 and 9) where you saw someone “lashing out”…
1 Like
Lazy. Whats the answer?
The answer to what? The imagination of the OP?
Maybe not all were leashing out but are you denying they were deflecting?
As you can clearly see this poster was lashing out…as you can see right out of starting gate he was making it about the poster/OP.
She can explain it to her constituents like Feinstein did to hers:
“Lashing out”?
1 Like
Why not post the full video? It doesn’t exonerate her but at least it’s not an open hit job. I’ll bet you haven’t even seen it.
Who give a ■■■■ about my spelling.
It’s all you have…
Because I didn’t want to.
I wasn’t commenting on your spelling. I was commenting on your delightfully histrionic description of my post.
As far as I know, you spelled “lashing out” correctly.
1 Like
Why is that funny?
Conan, how in the world is that “lashing out”?
TheDoctor was right… exactly what the OP did.
Maybe I should ask… what do you define as “lashing out”? Because TheDoc made an observation, then asked a question.
The fact that not one action has been taken against Trump is proof enough that if there isn’t evidence he’ll ride out his term.
Honestly even if there is evidence he’ll probably ride out his term. The GOP has made it pretty clear that unless the much rumored video footage of him with a kid surfaces, they’re not going to move against him. He’s too popular.
I also think it’s debatable if that video DOES surface, anything will be done. But maybe.
Or proof he didn’t do anything illegal.
Thats exactly what Im saying.
Can you give me a link to Mueller’s report? You seem to have it on hand, and I can’t find it (wasn’t even aware it was out yet). See, this is the problem. Literally none of us, not the general public, nor the politicians in DC, have any insight into what findings Mueller;'s report will produce. But here you are, claiming it’s all a story. You seem to believe you know the truth, lacking the actual evidence. Think about that…
And no, if the Mueller report does not put forth evidence of collusion, the left isn’t going to suddenly turn on Mueller… You guys already pulled that trick 
As for Trump Tower, so what? Heh. You were just going on about leftists being lied to, and here you are admitting he lied, and you’ve got no issues with it. Speaks volumes, don’t it?
1 Like
No. An absense of evidence is not evidense of absense.
Read the original post. Would you consider it lashing out too?
