Do you really and honestly believe the entire medical and healthcare system was in the tank for Joe Biden?
Seriously?
And that maybe a simpler explanation exists?
Do you really and honestly believe the entire medical and healthcare system was in the tank for Joe Biden?
Seriously?
And that maybe a simpler explanation exists?
622,000 or 93,000
You are a lost cause, no this protocol was not tested and found lacking, just the opposite as the peer reviewed paper says. Show me otherwise and no the protocol is not giving already hospitalized patients HCQ.
There were a lot of studies that show that HCQ was not very effective at treating Covid-19⌠that the risks of the drug did not outweigh the benefit.
This conversation happened in real time⌠on this very board. Just because there are a handful of studies that disagree with that outcome does not negate the other side of the picture where there are many more studies that show the opposite.
Do not base an opinion on a single study, but on the body of literature.
Do you really and honestly believe the entire medical and healthcare system was in the tank for Joe Biden?
Nope. But I can see why a lib with a guilty conscience would want that to be true though.
Jezcoe:
zantax:
ohknow35:
Jezcoe:
So it is HCQ.
It was looked into⌠a lot.
Werenât those studies done on late stage patients?
He addressed this nonsense at the beginning of the video. We donât treat Aids with one drug, we donât treat cancer or hepatitis with one drug.
No⌠I get it. They also talked about the importance of masking. They are pushing the kitchen sink approach.
Still not sure why I should be pissed.
622,000 or 93,000
Conjecture.
JayJay:
Do you really and honestly believe the entire medical and healthcare system was in the tank for Joe Biden?
Nope. But I can see why a lib with a guilty conscience would want that to be true though.
Youâre the one that said it would have âimpacted the electionâ, not me.
It did impact the election. Libs were cheering when they realized that with enough dead bodies, they could win. They were very open about how that would sink the incumbent.
zantax:
You are a lost cause, no this protocol was not tested and found lacking, just the opposite as the peer reviewed paper says. Show me otherwise and no the protocol is not giving already hospitalized patients HCQ.
There were a lot of studies that show that HCQ was not very effective at treating Covid-19⌠that the risks of the drug did not outweigh the benefit.
This conversation happened in real time⌠on this very board. Just because there are a handful of studies that disagree with that outcome does not negate the other side of the picture where there are many more studies that show the opposite.
Do not base an opinion on a single study, but on the body of literature.
No sorry, you donât get to throw out large scale double blind studies that got great results by testing HCQ on hospitalized patients. This paper has over 50 supporting peer reviewed papers, they list them for you. The American journal of medicine doesnât publish false papers.
You are a lost cause, no this protocol was not tested and found lacking, just the opposite as the peer reviewed paper says. Show me otherwise and no the protocol is not giving already hospitalized patients HCQ.
Question, did Trump take HCQ as a part of his COVID treatment?
It did impact the election. Libs were cheering when they realized that with enough dead bodies, they could win. They were very open about how that would sink the incumbent.
Well actually thatâs not what happened at allâŚbut this doesnât address your post where you intimated the deaths were on purpose so Libs could cheer for them to happen.
Which would require the medical establishment to be in on it.
Which would require the medical establishment to be in on it.
Monolithic thinking from the hive. The norm.
No sorry, you donât get to throw out large scale double blind studies that got great results by testing HCQ on hospitalized patients.
Like this one? https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/nejmoa2016638
Or this one https://www.thelancet.com/journals/eclinm/article/PIIS2589-5370(20)30389-8/fulltext
etc.
etc
etc
zantax:
No sorry, you donât get to throw out large scale double blind studies that got great results by testing HCQ on hospitalized patients.
Like this one? https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/nejmoa2016638
Or this one https://www.thelancet.com/journals/eclinm/article/PIIS2589-5370(20)30389-8/fulltext
etc.
etc
etc
Iâve got to find the most recent paper I found that has a mechanistic explanation as to why HCQ showed in vitro but not clinical activity.
zantax:
No sorry, you donât get to throw out large scale double blind studies that got great results by testing HCQ on hospitalized patients.
Like this one? https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/nejmoa2016638
Or this one https://www.thelancet.com/journals/eclinm/article/PIIS2589-5370(20)30389-8/fulltext
etc.
etc
etc
That isnât the protocol, sorry.
Which would require the medical establishment to be in on it.
This is where conspiracies fall apart
JayJay:
Which would require the medical establishment to be in on it.
This is where conspiracies fall apart
They were following guidance from the top, thatâs all. And were denied the information from doctors who did their jobs and treated patients instead, as they all got stricken from social media.
This paper has over 50 supporting peer reviewed papers, they list them for you.
Yeah⌠the first paper listed is about needs for mobile phone and reporting of Covid.
Donât pad the numbers to make it so HCQ is being âsuppressedâ
They were following guidance from the top, thatâs all. And were denied the information from doctors who did their jobs and treated patients instead, as they all got stricken from social media.
There are tons of papers that tested the efficacy of HCQ.
It wasnât suppressed.
Again, itâs a combination protocol that begins immediately upon being tested positive, not just HCQ
zantax:
They were following guidance from the top, thatâs all. And were denied the information from doctors who did their jobs and treated patients instead, as they all got stricken from social media.
There are tons of papers that tested the efficacy of HCQ.
It wasnât suppressed.
Hilarious, youtube even pulled this senate committee hearing down.