85% of US Covid deaths were avoidable

[Sknyluv]

@SixFoot

All true. The left danced and cheered every 1,000 deaths. “We’re gonna win because of this!”

“All true.”

[SixFoot]

Yep. Now, plug your ears and do as the TV says.

[zantax]

The treatment protocol from the peer reviewed paper.

https://www.amjmed.com/article/S0002-9343(20)30673-2/fulltext

Note the date August 6, 2020

[Jezcoe]

@SixFoot

All true. The left danced and cheered every 1,000 deaths. “We’re gonna win because of this!”

Once again… you cracked the code.

[SixFoot]

There was never a code. Y’all wore it on your sleeves.

[Jezcoe]

@zantax

@Jezcoe

@zantax

@Jezcoe

@zantax

Watch it and tell me where he is wrong.

I am in a low internet environment in the Maine woods.

How about doing that thing where the video is summarized so we don’t have to waste 20 minutes of our lives.

I did summarize, I’ll copy it into the OP Here is the relevant peer reviewed paper. You are going to be pissed.

Pathophysiological Basis and Rationale for Early Outpatient Treatment of SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) Infection - PubMed

What am I supposed to glean from that abstract?

Well I assumed you knew how to get from the abstract to the paper but here

https://www.amjmed.com/article/S0002-9343(20)30673-2/fulltext

Okay… I read it.

Why would I be pissed?

[Jezcoe]

@SixFoot

There was never a code. Y’all wore it on your sleeves.

We did did we?

If only there were a couple of threads that were thousands of posts long that documented opinions in real time that we could go back to.

[ohknow35]

@PurpnGold

Or dog dewormer

Ivermectin is never used for humans??

[zantax]

@Jezcoe

@zantax

@Jezcoe

@zantax

@Jezcoe

@zantax

Watch it and tell me where he is wrong.

I am in a low internet environment in the Maine woods.

How about doing that thing where the video is summarized so we don’t have to waste 20 minutes of our lives.

I did summarize, I’ll copy it into the OP Here is the relevant peer reviewed paper. You are going to be pissed.

Pathophysiological Basis and Rationale for Early Outpatient Treatment of SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) Infection - PubMed

What am I supposed to glean from that abstract?

Well I assumed you knew how to get from the abstract to the paper but here

https://www.amjmed.com/article/S0002-9343(20)30673-2/fulltext

Okay… I read it.

Why would I be pissed?

Because it was buried and ridiculed, stricken from social media, because had doctors followed it instead of saying there was no treatment has cost 85% of victims their lives. That’s why. Holy cow, they even pulled his Senate testimony off youtube.

[SixFoot]

There are, but please, continue plugging those ears and deflecting. It wouldn’t be very lib not to.

[Jezcoe]

@zantax

Because it was buried and ridiculed, stricken from social media, because had doctors followed it instead of saying there was no treatment cost 85% of victims their lives. That’s why. Holy cow,

So it is HCQ.

It was looked into… a lot.

It wasn’t the magic pill that we all hoped it would be.

Too bad it wasn’t because it would have been awesome if it was.

[SixFoot]

@zantax

Because it was buried and ridiculed, stricken from social media, because had doctors followed it instead of saying there was no treatment has cost 85% of victims their lives. That’s why. Holy cow, they even pulled his Senate testimony off youtube.

Libs don’t care. All they wanted was the election.

[zantax]

@Jezcoe

@zantax

Because it was buried and ridiculed, stricken from social media, because had doctors followed it instead of saying there was no treatment cost 85% of victims their lives. That’s why. Holy cow,

So it is HCQ.

It was looked into… a lot.

It wasn’t the magic pill that we all hoped it would be.

Too bad it wasn’t because it would have been awesome if it was.

For petes sake, watch the video, read the peer reviewed paper in the premier medical journal in the US. Open your eyes.

[Jezcoe]

@zantax

@Jezcoe

@zantax

Because it was buried and ridiculed, stricken from social media, because had doctors followed it instead of saying there was no treatment cost 85% of victims their lives. That’s why. Holy cow,

So it is HCQ.

It was looked into… a lot.

It wasn’t the magic pill that we all hoped it would be.

Too bad it wasn’t because it would have been awesome if it was.

For petes sake, watch the video, read the peer reviewed paper in the premier medical journal in the US. Open your eyes.

I did read the paper.

I don’t see why I should be pissed.

[zantax]

@Jezcoe

@zantax

@Jezcoe

@zantax

Because it was buried and ridiculed, stricken from social media, because had doctors followed it instead of saying there was no treatment cost 85% of victims their lives. That’s why. Holy cow,

So it is HCQ.

It was looked into… a lot.

It wasn’t the magic pill that we all hoped it would be.

Too bad it wasn’t because it would have been awesome if it was.

For petes sake, watch the video, read the peer reviewed paper in the premier medical journal in the US. Open your eyes.

I did read the paper.

I don’t see why I should be pissed.

Because a protocol that could have reduced Covid deaths in the US by 85% was ridiculed and suppressed. This is willful obtuseness at this point.

[ohknow35]

@Jezcoe

So it is HCQ.

It was looked into… a lot.

Weren’t those studies done on late stage patients?

[zantax]

@ohknow35

@Jezcoe

So it is HCQ.

It was looked into… a lot.

Weren’t those studies done on late stage patients?

He addressed this nonsense at the beginning of the video. We don’t treat Aids with one drug, we don’t treat cancer or hepatitis with one drug.

[Jezcoe]

@zantax

Because a protocol that could have reduced Covid deaths in the US by 85% was ridiculed and suppressed. This is willful obtuseness at this point.

It wasn’t ridiculed or suppressed.

It was tested and found to be lacking.

Man… it seriously is groundhog day again.

[zantax]

@Jezcoe

@zantax

Because a protocol that could have reduced Covid deaths in the US by 85% was ridiculed and suppressed. This is willful obtuseness at this point.

It wasn’t ridiculed or suppressed.

It was tested and found to be lacking.

Man… it seriously is groundhog day again.

You are a lost cause, no this protocol was not tested and found lacking, just the opposite as the peer reviewed paper says. Show me otherwise and no the protocol is not giving already hospitalized patients HCQ.

[Jezcoe]

@zantax

@ohknow35

@Jezcoe

So it is HCQ.

It was looked into… a lot.

Weren’t those studies done on late stage patients?

He addressed this nonsense at the beginning of the video. We don’t treat Aids with one drug, we don’t treat cancer or hepatitis with one drug.

No… I get it. They also talked about the importance of masking. They are pushing the kitchen sink approach.

Still not sure why I should be pissed.