I’m having trouble finding the video but what I can gather from print is that the violations relate to a freedom of information request. They are alleging the FOI request was not serviced to the letter of the law.
There are some claims of election law violations thrown in there as well, but it all seems to be in the context of the election material handling within the FOI request.
I’ll be interested in watching the litigation, but if it turns out that all of the violations are coupled to the FOI request that is a separate issue from election fraud.
If the material was handled properly in the context of the election and any recounts/audits and mishandling only came into play within the FOI I would lean toward it being general bureaucratic resistance to FOI’s, but I would want a deep dive on the exact nature of the violations and what was destroyed/left off the FOI.
The trouble I have with interpreting these preliminary articles/claims is that there have been so many lies and bad faith activity on the fraud-claimers that I can not take their characterizations at face value.
I have not seen the same bad faith from people running the elections. So it leaves me to wait for the litigation to play out in a more truthful arena— the court.