2020 Election Fraud Thread (Part 2)

No they didn’t. The dems did not spend 30 millions tax payer dollars

When you link to the cost of the investigation check which party appointed Mueller. Thanks In advance.

It’s like me quoting Tucker Carlson and saying he’s an impartial observer.

1 Like

The peaceful protesting Trump locomotive is chugging full steam ahead. All the while screams from the left that the election of 2020 was not rigged will become fainter and fainter.

Most any Republican not already on board as a supportive passenger, especially up for election in 2022 or 2024 will likely see their fate is doomed on the same tracks as these Dems too.

From the article you linked to:

Gableman told a group of Trump supporters in November that he thought the election was stolen. A former Trump official appears to be working on the investigation. Gableman has not said who he has hired or submitted any invoices seeking payment yet.

His investigation has already drawn bipartisan criticism. Republican state Sen. Kathy Bernier, chair of the Senate elections committee, said earlier this month, “There is not a reason to spread misinformation about this past election when we have all the evidence that shows otherwise.”

Gableman also has stated that he does not know how elections are run in this state. I believe that when the results show once again that there was no election fraud there are going to be a bunch of pissed off taxpayers in that state. The Republicans are shooting themselves in the foot to please the orange one.

Hyperbolic nonsense.

1 Like

deflection-5ac66b

2 Likes

Yep, those who don’t go along with “The Big Lie” will be branded RINOS.

At least for the time being.

But it is more then just being branded. It is a direct attack on the cornerstone of our democracy. Lead by a man who claims he loves this country but in reality doesn’t give a ■■■■ as long as he can turn a profit and look good while he does it.

I don’t disagree.

It will be interesting to see how many Liz Cheney’s appear as time goes on. It’s a pure political calculation on Republicans part that this B.S. won’t last forever. They may be wrong.

Let them violate their oaths of office to protect the Constitution by participating in actual upcoming voter “fraud”.

Yes they are. Perfectly said. :wink:

Good to see that finally there is consensus that the ridiculous claims that there was consequential election fraud in the 2020 presidential election is nothing more than hyperbolic nonsense.

You are mistaken…

1 Like

And Zuckerberg’s 300 million dollar donation towards installing the Democrat version of electoral integrity in swing states and getting out the voters of only one party.

https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=https://www.vox.com/platform/amp/recode/2020/9/1/21417022/mark-zuckerberg-elections-300-million-facebook-center-for-tech-and-civic-life&ved=2ahUKEwjW2vX-9MjzAhULT30KHS2QD84QFnoECDMQAQ&usg=AOvVaw2utY3AA-lEkEsgYda-RYW-&ampcf=1

1 Like

You have a problem with private political donations?

Has Trump suggested that Republicans may boycott the 2022 midterms and 2024 presidential election because he is not happy about the resolution of the “presidential election fraud of 2020”? Does this mean he will be running in 2028 instead?

They were used as political donations targeted for Democrat gains in vote count, but were not registered as donations to the Democrat party. I do have a problem with that.

1 Like

We were talking about wasting tax dollars on audits of the 2020 election, not political donations, so I’m honestly not sure what your point is.

Biden wins Georgia yet again

2 Likes

Another clown show

One of them, Suzi Voyles, said she saw ballots that were not creased and appeared to have been marked by computer rather than by hand. She identified Box 5 and Batches 28-36, but none of the ballots in those batches matched her description, investigators said.

Voyles also told investigators she could have been mistaken in her sworn statement and might have seen counterfeit ballots in Box 135, Batches 28-36. Investigators found that Box 135 with Batches 28-36 didn’t exist.

Debunks once again the claim that ballots were kept in “suitcases”

The alleged “suitcases” of ballots were normal ballot bins, which election workers had opened and sorted, but hadn’t yet scanned for tabulation. Election workers put the ballots in the bins and stored them beneath a table when they thought they were going to go home for the night, but they later counted them when an elections supervisor instructed them to keep working.