Yes. They were just guessing. Fox news talked about “election protection.” What in blazes is “election protection?” 
Would it be judicious to ensure that people are confident in the legitimacy of the two GA senate run-offs election to have independent observers from other countries observe those elections?
Desperate people take desperate actions.
I have heard that each genuine ballot was water-marked with nanotech block-chain encryption which allowed the locations of every genuine ballot to be tracked: where and when they were delivered, where and when they were gathered into bundles, where and when bundles were storehouse for eventual use, which polling location they were delivered to, how many delivered together at one time. Maybe that’s why Trump is relaxed enough to play golf while the FBI and DoJ investigate. The investigations have the potential to flush out those manoeuvring the ballots, and those in the FBI and DoJ not interested in getting to the facts.
Of course. That sounds very plausible - not at all like bad sci-fi written internet trolls.
I’m not saying how plausible it is. I’m simply pointing out what I heard.
Does that sound real to you?
I heard Donald Trump is a lizard person.
3 Likes
I was hearing buzz on social media today from Trumpers around how this election was actually a sting operation but no further clarification…now it makes “sense” 
Good lord the things folks will believe
3 Likes
And how exactly do you prove that charge.
Allan
Almost all penn counties mail in ballots where for biden.
I guess even the red counties are in on the fraud too…
Allan
Trump back up in WI after “glitch” reversed
1 Like
When this one is confirmed not that it was confirmed.
This isn’t hard. Keep on trucking
It seems to me that the only way the American people can be certain of the legitimacy of the Senate run-off elections, given the current commentary, is for there to be independent observers from other countries oversee the conduct of those run-offs.
1 Like
Why would we trust them?
1 Like
Because their brief would be to ensure that the elections were conducted fairly.
Oh, well, if they say so. Please. I am a no with allowing the “world” to observe our elections, they are further left than Democrats are.
1 Like
Man… if we talked about our elections the way we talk about third world country’s… we are getting into that category.
1 Like
Piling evidence? Really?
Where are the receipts? I’m not talking about false assumptions and repeating the narrative from the administration and Trump’s sycophants. You guys are in your feelings. What did some of you tell Hillary supporters back in 2016 and anti-trumpers? Oh yeah, I remember, " ■■■■ your feelings".
In 2020 I share that sentiment.
Lord forgive for my foul language… 
Mail in voting made it easier for many t participate in democracy.
That’s a good thing.
Don’t you see the danger in that??
You have a group of people RIGHT now who are saying “my guy lost, there must be fraud!”
Well, he lost in multiple states
“Then there is fraud in multiple states”
Some states are being run by Republicans
“Well, then they are in on it or bad at their jobs”
There are independent monitors “don’t trust them”
There are monitors watching from both sides of the campign “nope. Don’t believe it. Anyone who says there are must be lying”
The cases are all being thrown out of court “liberal justices don’t want the truth”
Want us to have international monitors next time? “Nope. Don’t trust them”
See the slope. See how dangerous this is.
There is now a large group of people that unless their guy wins, thinks it must be fraud. Period.
Trump was always going to be Trump. But the people like Mitch who are encouraging this and not speaking up in order to get their based fired up are simply bad Americans.
6 Likes
