Is this the part where we pretend the graph wouldn’t flip if the election had gone the other way? And cities would be on fire to boot?
1 Like
But it wouldn’t. How do I know??
Because in 2016 it didn’t.
The race was closer with less states involved and get, it didn’t.
Clearly this is evidence that Trump likely got millions less legal votes than reported. Millions!
1 Like
Let’s see it. Oh and accusing people of voter suppression instead isn’t any better.
When this doesn’t come true, would you consider not ever using GatewayPundit for your news in the future? They do have a record of being a tad unreliable. How many times do you keep going back to a source that fools you over and over and over again? Unless truth isn’t important to you…?
4 Likes
The process is already defined by the prevailing laws on the books right now. Frankly, will not surprise me that Purdue already passed the 50% threshold needing to gain election already as voting fraud is surely being investigated on that level too.
No It’s not. You guys are being had. The President is setting up PACs and is using contributions for voter fraud litigation to pay down campaign debts. He is well within his rights to do as he pleases.
Ladies and gentlemen, FreeAndClear has for our reading enjoyment another conspiracy hunch out there…
Trump, Purdue and others candidates who ran are perfectly within their individual to contest elections results plain and simple.
They most certainly are. What’s my conspiracy hunch? It’s in the fine print of the website that is taking the contributions.
For each contribution made to the Trump campaign’s joint fundraising committee with the Republican National Committee, 60% will be deposited into the campaign’s general election account for retirement of debt, or into the campaign’s Recount Account if that debt has been paid off.
1 Like
Ha that’s just a total lie, aimed at you, not aimed at me.
1 Like
I agree 100%. The ones truly damaging our elections are those who are decrying voter fraud with no evidence, thereby destroying faith in the elections. It would be different if there were actual evidence, but to make the assertion with no concrete evidence? I expect that from websites and talk radio, they are in the business of ginning up their base. But watching prominent politicians who have a responsibility to the country throw out claims is highly irresponsible and corrosive to our system. The responsible thing would be to say we should let court cases proceed to determine if any fraud occurred.
3 Likes
Democrats haven’t been muttering about voter fraud being endemic for decades.
Actually, using the logic that has been presented, Biden got more votes the Ossoff and no way someone voted for Biden and then a Libertarian canidate
Using the same standard Ossoff should demand that GA opens and reviews voter fraud. He probably won the race with 50% but the GOP, who runs Georgia elections , cheated!
I know it’s true, my wife’s third cousin sister dated a poll worker who was told to white out votes for Ossoff and change it.
2 Likes
No, they prefer accusations of voter suppression.
1 Like
will Nick still think it is a conspiracy?
3 Likes
Well, ah…
… … … … ummm
… … … … … … You can’t take Trump or his website seriously. CONSIPIRADCY THEORY!!!
.
.
.
.WW, PSHS
3 Likes
Note the green lines are longer than the red here.
from https://www.opensecrets.org/2020-presidential-race/donald-trump/candidate?id=N00023864
Also note the cash on hand versus debt totals. So what campaign debt?
And how much cash on hand? 43 million and change , I’d like to be in that much debt lol.
Which makes the sad attempt at “I’m rubber, you’re glue” all that much more entertaining
Yes i saw that.
Ok this makes more sense now - the link is from 10/23
1 Like
