I’ll start off by saying I don’t agree that students should be punished in school for statements made outside of school, at least in a general sense.
But this got me thinking:
There are enough ethical rules for lawyers that it takes an entire semester to teach them - and many of them forbid various sorts of statements in any context.
These rules are promulgated by each state’s Bar Association, which is not a government entity - but they are enforced by that state’s court system, which is.
If a law is violated, that is the appropriate recourse. But I don’t think a public high school has the authority to suspend for off campus racist comments.
Yes, I know. Are high school students licensed by the state to student? Is becoming a lawyer mandatory by law?
Disbarring is in effect the removal of a state issued license. If we are going to evolve this conversation into government licensing requirements, we’re going to be here a while.
.
.
So, B. L. agreed to a code of conduct, a set of rules she would follow for being on the team.
She is not expected to adhere to that to which she agreed before hand?
What kind of lesson is this teaching our young people? Seems to be that actions don’t have consequences. I think there is a big differences between some random student posting something to social media, and a member of a specific team that agreed to a code of conduct and then violated the code she’d agreed to follow.
.
.
.
.WW, PSHS