But what does matter is if it was preventable and who failed to do so. Every child who drowns in a pool is a tragedy, but it’s more of a tragedy if someone was negligent and could have prevented it.
Of course they wish that just like they would wish tbe perpetrator did not relocate here if they cam here legally etc etc.
The point I am making is a Republican Presidency would not to be blame just like a democratic presidency is not to blame.
What if the piece of crap had been here illegally since the 80s would it be the fault of Reagan?
It would be the fault of Reagan and every subsequent admin who failed to find and deport him.
1 Like
It is the fault of the left not wanting to do anything about it. If we spent our vast resources on deporting rather than welcoming crimes committed by illegals would plummet.
Cause and effect.
2 Likes
Well there is always some level of negligence in a pool death. Parent not supervising, child not following safety instructions.
The argument you are making does not hold up.
Lets be honest those of you who are blaming Biden and the dems sure as heck would not be blaming Trump if he had crossed over illegally in 2018. No you would be still be blaming previous admins.
This thread has ■■■■ all to do with the horrific crime perpetrated against a child and everything to do with scoring cheap political points.
1 Like
No its not, its the fault of the individual who committed the offence.
He can commit crimes in his country.
3 Likes
Once again…this is a deflection.
The story is a ten year old…an elementary kid for whom carrying a child to term could be life threatening…had to go elsewhere for an abortion.
And there are people on the right who wanted to force her to go through that…even now there are some on the right saying she should have. And now they want to investigate the doctor who helped her.
And to deflect from that, now you’re being told to be outraged over illegal immigration.
This is PRECISELY what is happening…and I can see from posts here that the manipulation is working.
2 Likes
Legally, this is far from certain - and practically, it is completely false.
The law is intentionally poorly defined, for this exact purpose - no matter how you might try to argue that this girl met the exception, there’s no doubt a prosecutor could make an equally compelling argument that it didn’t meet the exception - and the purpose of the ambiguity is to scare doctors from even attempting it.
Which is why she was refered to Indiana.
4 Likes
I do not understand why more people don’t get this.
1 Like
Right, we wouldn’t care if illegals raped kids if Trump was in charge. And it looks like he has been here since at least 2015, soTrump does indeed get some of the blame.
I think they do get it.
The whole point is the plausible deniability.
Once again…the story is an ELEMENTARY SCHOOL GIRL WAS RAPED AND WAS PREGNANT…
…and there are people out there who wanted to force her to carry the child to term.
But let’s not look at that. Let’s look at “bad bad illegals”.
1 Like
Because it’s baseless speculation. If she had tried and been turned away, you might have a point.
1 Like
It’s not baseless in the slightest.
The laws aren’t clear cut and they are made that way deliberately.
What a stupid post. Illegal and citizen access are not the same. If there are 10 rape cases by illegals and 10,000 by citizens and you eliminate the access for illegals, you eliminated 10 rape victims.
Illegals shouldn’t be here. Citizens have a right to be here.
Comparing apples to zebras.
1 Like
She was turned away.
Why do you think she went to Indiana?
Get back to us when someone actually denies a ten year old rape victim an abortion and I will complain with you.
Link?
On Monday three days after the Supreme Court issued its groundbreaking decision to overturn Roe v. Wade, Dr. Caitlin Bernard, an Indianapolis obstetrician-gynecologist, took a call from a colleague, a child abuse doctor in Ohio.
Hours after the Supreme Court action, the Buckeye state had outlawed any abortion after six weeks. Now this doctor had a 10-year-old patient in the office who was six weeks and three days pregnant.
Could Bernard help?
