Why does it matter when he wrote it? He also wrote the quotes conservatives love to post, before some of them were even born.
Who cares?
I am connected to the past through efforts of civil rights. I recognize how important it was that people before me paved the way for me to be able to be the person I am today.
Again … from that same book you all now love to quote…
“First, it is necessary to understand that Black Power is a cry of disappointment. The Black Power slogan did not spring full grown from the head of some philosophical Zeus. It was born from the wounds of despair and disappointment. It is a cry of daily hurt and persistent pain. For centuries the Negro has been caught in the tentacles of white power. Many Negroes have given up faith in the white majority because “white power” with total control has left them empty-handed. So in reality the call for Black Power is a reaction to the failure of white power”
Thus your avatar is a cry of disappointment. You scream “I am a victim”. But in 50 years, it changed from an epiphany, a wake-up call, into a warm blanket of victimhood on which you can rely to solicit alliances from those white knights you call white liberals.
You like that book Tommy quoted? Shall we use it some more?
“Black Power is a psychological reaction to the psycho- logical indoctrination that led to the creation of the perfect slave. While this reaction has often led to negative and unre- alistic responses and has frequently brought about intemper- ate words and actions, one must not overlook the positive value in calling the Negro to a new sense of manhood, to a deep feeling of racial pride and to an audacious apprecia- tion of his heritage. The Negro must be grasped by a new realization of his dignity and worth. He must stand up amid a system that still oppresses him and develop an unassailable and majestic sense of his own value. He must no longer be ashamed of being black.”
If you read the book you continually quote… you would realize that MLK also focused on the past. He wasn’t a slave… but he mentions slavery several times in that book.
Does that make him less of a man because he also understands that his life in 1967 was made possible by many people before and their sacrifice?
However he is black… why is he allowed to focus on the past, without being less of a man?
So am I.
Again… you said talking about the past makes one less of a man. Not sure why MLK would be excluded. Hell I am not sure why anyone who talks about the civil war would be excluded. Or the American revolution. Or WW1 and 2.
Can’t talk about the past without being less of a man, right?