just a quick blurb. no big deal. except several kids were shot
no pictures of perp either.
CNN
just a quick blurb. no big deal. except several kids were shot
no pictures of perp either.
CNN
btw it is a mass shooting
per CNN:
âCNN and the Gun Violence Archive define a mass shooting as a shooting that injured or killed four or more people, not including the shooter.â
9 in this case
my goodness. thatâs amazing âmass shootingâ wasnt mentioned in the op article huh?
wonder why
wonder wonder whyâŚ.
From the link:
Two people have been arrested in the shooting that wounded nine children at a Columbus, Georgia, gas station earlier this month, police announced Friday.
The suspects were identified as 35-year-old DâAngelo Robinson, Sr., and an unnamed 15-year-old male,
15 year old, how â â â â â â â pathetic are this piece of â â â â parents.
As sad and senseless this incident was, what makes it so special? There were no life threatening injuries and seven of nine were released from care the next day. Sucks for those innocent kids and their families, but such is life in America these days.
So whatâs the beef?
That CNN (which almost no one watches or reads) failed to show the picture of a black gang member even though other news outlets did?
Not white enough to make a stink over. NEXT!
CNN was so sneaky at covering up that it was a black shooter they published his name, DâAngelo Robinson.
I hope he gets 10 years consecutive for each kid, no time off for good behavior.
funny no cries for a â national conversationâ etcâŚ
pathetic
Over this one particular incident? What makes it so special over the hundreds of âmass shootingsâ this year?
it doesnât fit the democratsâ and mediaâs narrative.
thanks for asking
Pretty stupid of them to publish his name, wasnât it?
bare minimum
bare minimum
So they were doing the right thing, just not well enough. Thatâs fair.
Move on folksâŚnothing to see hereâŚ
As sad and senseless this incident was, what makes it so special?
It was the result of gang violence when an argument spilled over from a nearby party. Give out too much information and one personâs people go looking for revenge. Lather, rinse, repeat.
Is that a âblackâ name?
no pictures of perp either.
This doesnât help promote the âwhite supremacyâ narrative thatâs being fed.
So they were doing the right thing, just not well enough.
correct. subversive âjournalismâ toward a particular political agenda
youâre finally starting to get this
It was the result of gang violence when an argument spilled over from a nearby party. Give out too much information and one personâs people go looking for revenge. Lather, rinse, repeat.
would you say this is a bigger problem than say, âwhite nationalism?â
would you say this is a bigger problem than say, âwhite nationalism?â
Iâd say the same thing I said in the make a strawman thread thatâs still running. That wasnât the statement made it the report⌠it was specifically about domestic terrorism, not gang violence.
Now if you want to talk about gang violence and how it is disproportionately responsible for the number of firearm deaths in the United States, you can start a thread on that.
i wanted your opinion on it
gang violence is a big threat too iâd say