Should midwives be required to have admitting privileges? Birth is far more risky for the woman that abortion.
People overstep or use a poor choice of words from time to time.
If they are willing to apologize and retract then I allow them to.
That goes for everyone. No matter what.
Jezcoe: Safiel:Schumer has apologized and retracted.
Hopefully everybody who wrongfully defended him will retract their defenses.
Even the liberal American Bar Association condemned his remarks yesterday, so their should be no defenses to his remarks whatsoever.
Good on him.
He did the right thing.
No, he did the wrong thing and then covered his ass.
At least he has apologized. When has your leader, Trump, ever apologized?
They have some extensive regulations in LA. Admitting privileges are not required and need not be.
Sometimes babies are born en route to medical careā¦abortions are not.
They have some extensive regulations in LA. Admitting privileges are not required and need not be.
Sometimes babies are born en route to medical careā¦abortions are not.
So a less safe procedure, giving birth, does not require admitting privileges than a safer procedure, abortion?
Tell us again how the welfare of the woman is your top concern here. I need a good laugh.
Not Schumer in particularā¦the whole scenarioā¦Thereās a CEC radio host/ troll/ āmean girlā, in the Whitehouse. What I am saying he has bought political discourse down to that level.
I came down against Schumerās comment and think he should apologize but some of you people are making this far more than it is. Wow!
He should apologize because others could misconstrue his comment as a call for violence. Politicians shouldnāt speak unclearly here. I personally donāt see his comments as a call for violence.
Wow! Schumer should be forced to recuse on all further Trump judicial appointment votes.
Schumer has apologized and retracted.
Hopefully everybody who wrongfully defended him will retract their defenses.
Even the liberal American Bar Association condemned his remarks yesterday, so their should be no defenses to his remarks whatsoever.
Apology not accepted.
Great post.
Safiel:Schumer has apologized and retracted.
Hopefully everybody who wrongfully defended him will retract their defenses.
Even the liberal American Bar Association condemned his remarks yesterday, so their should be no defenses to his remarks whatsoever.
Good on him.
He did the right thing.
Borgia_dude:I came down against Schumerās comment and think he should apologize but some of you people are making this far more than it is. Wow!
He should apologize because others could misconstrue his comment as a call for violence. Politicians shouldnāt speak unclearly here. I personally donāt see his comments as a call for violence.
Wow! Schumer should be forced to recuse on all further Trump judicial appointment votes.
Nope.
WuWei: Borgia_dude:I came down against Schumerās comment and think he should apologize but some of you people are making this far more than it is. Wow!
He should apologize because others could misconstrue his comment as a call for violence. Politicians shouldnāt speak unclearly here. I personally donāt see his comments as a call for violence.
Wow! Schumer should be forced to recuse on all further Trump judicial appointment votes.
Nope.
Of course he should. He is incapable of objectivity. Wow!
You didnāt read the emergency care and physician transfer regs did you?
gooddad409: ImRightYoureWrong: thinkingman:Unbelievable. I am shocked
Trump supporters āshockedā by someone challenging our nationās institutions
Threatening not challenging. Specific Justices at that.
when faced with unpleasant reality, the left just invents a new reality
They sure do!
not the same as āyou will pay the price, and you wonāt know what hit youā
markdido: Jezcoe: Safiel:Schumer has apologized and retracted.
Hopefully everybody who wrongfully defended him will retract their defenses.
Even the liberal American Bar Association condemned his remarks yesterday, so their should be no defenses to his remarks whatsoever.
Good on him.
He did the right thing.
No, he did the wrong thing and then covered his ass.
At least he has apologized. When has your leader, Trump, ever apologized?
I think youāre in the wrong thread. Please review the thread title for a clue about the thread topic. Thanks!
This is pretty bad.
āyou have released the whirlwind and you will pay the price. You wonāt know what hit you, if you go forward with these awful decisions.ā
Now consider what the issue is. Louisiana wants attending physicians to have admitting privileges to a full care facility 30 miles or closer to insure the well being of a mother in the event of complications.
How is this a bad thing?
I have been of the opinion that abortion āclinicsā should be part of a full care facilityā¦Not up to 30 miles away. Either it is about the well being of the woman and the best of care or it isnāt.
Itās an end around to close clinics. Most of these Physicians canāt get attending privileges in Louisiana because they provide abortion services. And you donāt need those privileges anyway, you would call an ambulance and have the patient sent to the ER, where the ER physician would care for the patient. Who already has privileges there.
And the more remote the clinic, the less chance you will have of getting privileges since there are fewer hospitals there.
Now, if this were true for all centers who perform procedures at similar risk that would be a precedent but that is not the case. For the most part, this is not a precedent and the overwhelming number of abortions use pills, not surgery, that the women use at home. Even induced clinic based abortions carry an extremely low complication rate.
And I donāt buy for a moment that folks on the Right are so uninformed that they donāt already know this, I know you know this. This is not about womenās health, this is about closing clinics you donāt like.
I absolutely agreeā¦Any Congressmen that donāt support Trump or his appointeeās, have no business voting on anything that Trump sends to Congresss for approvalā¦legislation, judges etc.
.
I absolutely agreeā¦Any Congressmen that donāt support Trump or his appointeeās, have no business voting on anything that Trump sends to Congresss for approvalā¦legislation, judges etc.
.
Is that what I said or what you need to hear?
Argumentum ad absurdum.
My argument is no more absurd than yours. Correct me if Iām wrongā¦That fact that Schumer spoke out against two judges Trump appointed, you think that disqualifies him from voting on other judges. And Iām the one taking the argument to the absurd?
( unless you were being sarcastic)
My argument is no more absurd than yours. Correct me if Iām wrongā¦That fact that Schumer spoke out against two judges Trump appointed, you think that disqualifies him from voting on other judges. And Iām the one taking the argument to the absurd?
( unless you were being sarcastic)
I said he should recuse himself since he canāt be objective.
Good on you for looking it up.