Wow Sen Schumer Shows What a Big Democrat Ass He Is By Threatening Supreme Court

thinkingman · March 5, 2020, 2:06pm

H_Arendt:

thinkingman:

H_Arendt:

thinkingman:

H_Arendt:

thinkingman:

H_Arendt:

thinkingman:

H_Arendt:

thinkingman:

H_Arendt:

thinkingman:

Unbelievable. I am shocked how bold Democrats are these days. Schumer is the worst of the worst. Over abortion

How horrible that a decision might be made that he and his leftist activist rabble dont like

seriously what a bastard.

“I want to tell you, Gorsuch. I want to tell you, Kavanaugh. You have released the whirlwind, and you will pay the price,”

https://mobile.twitter.com/BonillaJL/status/1235272766397583360

If you recall that was the exact Bible Reference Justice Kavanaugh made near the end of his confirmation hearing referring to those who opposed him.

But when Schumer echoes the same words as Kavanaugh you get your knickers in a twist?

Faux outrage in the extreme.

kavanaugh referred to an obvious massive ploy to smear him and his family on the part of the crazy bully democrats and ■■■■■■■ media

schumer’s threat was based on a court’s decision

democrats are sick

Kavanaugh was making.a clear threat to make decisions based on who had opposed him.

Sickness is solely in the eye of the beholder.

no he was defending himself, with an eye for justice on the part of the bastard democrats and their outright smear campaign

this has nothing to do with the opinion of any “beholder” that’s just your lame justification for Schumer’s bullying threats. sad

If Kavanaugh had any interest in defending himself he would have made a serious effort to rebut the allegations brought against him. His quote from the Bible was an attack on those who opposed him, it provided no defense whatsoever.

Kavanaugh was announcing how he intended to behave on the Supreme Court. Talk about a threat.

the accusations were not proven. there was nothing to “rebut”

your turn

The issue is whether Kavanaugh’s quote from the Bible was appropriate or not. Clearly it was not a defense, it was a threat. Equivalent to Schumer’s quote from the Bible.

you’re just repeating yourself. doesnt help your wrongness

Since you won’t address the issue, that led to some repetition. If you could explain the difference between the two uses of that Biblical passage you would demonstrate why I was wrong… but saying Kavanaugh used it as a defense simply has no credibility.

“come down my rabbit hole of narrative and deflection”

You won’t speak to the topic, obviously.

already have. and, i started the topic

sorry about your screeching and scraping rusty bang of a fail.

thinkingman · March 5, 2020, 2:07pm

schumer is topic. hes the one who just made the threats

if you’re stuck obsessing over what wapo tells you trump did thats not my problem

NebraskaFootball · March 5, 2020, 2:08pm

Why are you incapable of answering such a basic question? Weird.

H_Arendt · March 5, 2020, 2:22pm

thinkingman:

H_Arendt:

thinkingman:

H_Arendt:

thinkingman:

H_Arendt:

thinkingman:

H_Arendt:

thinkingman:

H_Arendt:

thinkingman:

H_Arendt:

thinkingman:

Unbelievable. I am shocked how bold Democrats are these days. Schumer is the worst of the worst. Over abortion

How horrible that a decision might be made that he and his leftist activist rabble dont like

seriously what a bastard.

“I want to tell you, Gorsuch. I want to tell you, Kavanaugh. You have released the whirlwind, and you will pay the price,”

https://mobile.twitter.com/BonillaJL/status/1235272766397583360

If you recall that was the exact Bible Reference Justice Kavanaugh made near the end of his confirmation hearing referring to those who opposed him.

But when Schumer echoes the same words as Kavanaugh you get your knickers in a twist?

Faux outrage in the extreme.

kavanaugh referred to an obvious massive ploy to smear him and his family on the part of the crazy bully democrats and ■■■■■■■ media

schumer’s threat was based on a court’s decision

democrats are sick

Kavanaugh was making.a clear threat to make decisions based on who had opposed him.

Sickness is solely in the eye of the beholder.

no he was defending himself, with an eye for justice on the part of the bastard democrats and their outright smear campaign

this has nothing to do with the opinion of any “beholder” that’s just your lame justification for Schumer’s bullying threats. sad

If Kavanaugh had any interest in defending himself he would have made a serious effort to rebut the allegations brought against him. His quote from the Bible was an attack on those who opposed him, it provided no defense whatsoever.

Kavanaugh was announcing how he intended to behave on the Supreme Court. Talk about a threat.

the accusations were not proven. there was nothing to “rebut”

your turn

The issue is whether Kavanaugh’s quote from the Bible was appropriate or not. Clearly it was not a defense, it was a threat. Equivalent to Schumer’s quote from the Bible.

you’re just repeating yourself. doesnt help your wrongness

Since you won’t address the issue, that led to some repetition. If you could explain the difference between the two uses of that Biblical passage you would demonstrate why I was wrong… but saying Kavanaugh used it as a defense simply has no credibility.

“come down my rabbit hole of narrative and deflection”

You won’t speak to the topic, obviously.

already have. and, i started the topic

sorry about your screeching and scraping rusty bang of a fail.

All you said was Kavanaugh was “defending himself”. I questioned how citing that Biblical reference constituted a defense and you did not respond.

Now you are falling back on insults because you have no real response. That’s SOP for conservatives around here.

gooddad409 · March 5, 2020, 2:33pm

NF is still trying to send me posts?

NebraskaFootball · March 5, 2020, 2:34pm

Not trying to send you posts, no. Just replying to posts I read that intrigue me and make me think of a reply. Like any other forum discussion.

Scratch · March 5, 2020, 2:46pm

What all these attacks on both sides prove is…Trump has bought all of Washington down to his level. Reality show bickering, the high school tweets etc etc…And its everyone thats involved in it fault, for letting themselves get sucked in.

Borgia_dude · March 5, 2020, 2:48pm

Four out of 70,000 requires a law? They went to the hospital and were treated. How would the law make any difference?

Quit being obtuse. You know why this law is being proposed. It isn’t being proposed for all the other outpatient procedures being done that have a higher rate of problems. It is targeted for abortion providers to make them go out of business. Just own it.

JayJay · March 5, 2020, 2:51pm

It appears to me that you have to do more research…

But as a conservative you should reject any regulation that is not required…even if you don’t want to research into the real reasons why La passed this law.

markdido · March 5, 2020, 3:04pm

Borgia_dude:

Camp:

This is pretty bad.

“you have released the whirlwind and you will pay the price. You won’t know what hit you, if you go forward with these awful decisions.”

Now consider what the issue is. Louisiana wants attending physicians to have admitting privileges to a full care facility 30 miles or closer to insure the well being of a mother in the event of complications.

How is this a bad thing?

I have been of the opinion that abortion “clinics” should be part of a full care facility…Not up to 30 miles away. Either it is about the well being of the woman and the best of care or it isn’t.

Abortion is incredibly safe. I believe in LA there were some 70,000 abortions of which 4 went to a hospital. Not sure that rises to the level requiring law.

We all know the law is to inhibit the practice of abortion.

The baby may have a different perspective.

Jezcoe · March 5, 2020, 3:08pm

markdido:

Borgia_dude:

Camp:

This is pretty bad.

“you have released the whirlwind and you will pay the price. You won’t know what hit you, if you go forward with these awful decisions.”

Now consider what the issue is. Louisiana wants attending physicians to have admitting privileges to a full care facility 30 miles or closer to insure the well being of a mother in the event of complications.

How is this a bad thing?

I have been of the opinion that abortion “clinics” should be part of a full care facility…Not up to 30 miles away. Either it is about the well being of the woman and the best of care or it isn’t.

Abortion is incredibly safe. I believe in LA there were some 70,000 abortions of which 4 went to a hospital. Not sure that rises to the level requiring law.

We all know the law is to inhibit the practice of abortion.

The baby may have a different perspective.

The embryo (which is the stage of development for the vast majority of abortions) does not have the physical capacity to care.

Borgia_dude · March 5, 2020, 3:13pm

I came down against Schumer’s comment and think he should apologize but some of you people are making this far more than it is. Wow!

He should apologize because others could misconstrue his comment as a call for violence. Politicians shouldn’t speak unclearly here. I personally don’t see his comments as a call for violence.

thinkingman · March 5, 2020, 3:17pm

because it has absolutely nothing to do with the topic

sorry. wont be biting on your deflection narrative bait

thinkingman · March 5, 2020, 3:21pm

there are no insults. kav was defending his name, his family since dems went on a lying smear crusade. why he feels a bible reference is appro is his business. to speculate as you are doing, and questioning is simply deflection

wondering what kind of lies you will post next…

thinkingman · March 5, 2020, 3:22pm

“trump’s fault”. lol. boy

merickson · March 5, 2020, 3:23pm

No, not Trump’s fault.
Voter’s fault that they elected the current leader in the race to government through a bully’s mouth.

Weedhopper · March 5, 2020, 3:25pm

What a freak, if he’s not pushing Russian collusion lies he’s threatening the Supreme Court.
Who claims this retard?

ImRightYoureWrong · March 5, 2020, 3:37pm

Trump supporters “shocked” by someone challenging our nation’s institutions

gooddad409 · March 5, 2020, 3:38pm

Threatening not challenging. Specific Justices at that.

Weedhopper · March 5, 2020, 3:42pm

You call a known Russian collusion liar who’s threatening the lives of our Supreme Court challengeing?

Strange!