A lot of our emails go externally to customers and clients so why take the risk of pissing someone off.
Sending comms of use and being professional is the most important thing, not an attempt to be cute or inspire someone.
A lot of our emails go externally to customers and clients so why take the risk of pissing someone off.
Sending comms of use and being professional is the most important thing, not an attempt to be cute or inspire someone.
Probably would have thrown him out on his ear for that.
But he so bwave and cweative to mindlessly prattle on about BL(sometimes)M.
gooddad409:
Probably would have thrown him out on his ear for that.
But he so bwave and cweative to mindlessly prattle on about BL(sometimes)M.
Yeah.
A lot of our emails go externally to customers and clients so why take the risk of pissing someone off.
Sending comms of use and being professional is the most important thing, not an attempt to be cute or inspire someone.
Ok, external is different.
Whether it was creative or not is in the eye of the beholder.
Itās the same logic that Harvard used to justify admitting David Hogg. He had a poor academic record and lousy test scores, but he was also a gun control zealot that repeatedly held tantrums for gun confiscation on cable news. Academic boards increasingly value left wing activism over actual intelligence, just as this Stanford case shows.
Rurudyne:
The point was that the woke, if they really are proper Woke, will likely do something to let you know. They will virtue signal after some fashion.
Then they are idiots, the same could be said who take the opposite view and want everyone to know how woke they are not. They are those who revel in that as well. Two sides of the same coin and i would want neither anywhere near me or my team.
Itās really not that hard to tell.
Nemesis:
Whether it was creative or not is in the eye of the beholder.
Itās the same logic that Harvard used to justify admitting David Hogg. He had a poor academic record and lousy test scores, but he was also a gun control zealot that repeatedly held tantrums for gun confiscation on cable news. Academic boards increasingly value left wing activism over actual intelligence, just as this Stanford case shows.
Why am I not surprised that Hogg had a poor academic record and lousy test scores.!
I knew he couldnāt be very bright.
Why not hire someone from a woke school ?
I am much more concerned with what they know and their character than where they went to school.
Besides, are we sure that being in said school would not make them anti-woke ? Similar to most ardent anti-communists being those who have lived in communist countries.
Why not hire someone from a woke school ?
I am much more concerned with what they know
Crit is what they know.