Would this give Kamala confidence in a vaccine?

Then you would be wrong. No short cuts have been taken. Zero. The validation and approval process is exactly the same. There is not even an allegation of a shortcut. Covering up test results is still a felony. Is it possible that some of the bureaucracy needed to be removed?

This would be the problem with ALL vaccines these days. And no product liability. Vaccine manufacturers are protected.

I don’t know that. I certainly hope no short cuts are taken but the CDC and FDA leaders are political appointees of “you know who”. And the desire for a vaccine by “that special day in November” is very high. I really hope you are right but we need to keep some skepticism regarding the govt decisions.
:us: :elephant:

And so it begins: Redfield says masks give better protection than vaccine.

They are figuring out the effectiveness of vaccines for respiratory viruses.

Under existing law, vaccine manufacturers are immune from litigation. They have a special court to dole out damages if they occur.

Yeah, you said it a lot better.

1 Like

Without this in place, no corporation in their right mind would make vaccines.

1 Like