You care enough to make a claim… figured you would care enough to back it up.
I accept your surrender
Again … You asked, I answered. Don’t read so much into it.
“Surrender” 
Surely you know me better than that. 
What does that have to do with this case?
What law did he break?
I did mention rights.
Talk to the cops who responded to a call about a guy in a store with a firearm.
Did he get arrested? Was he charged with anything?
I’m talking to you. What law did he break?
1 Like
I don’t care.
1 Like
Yep…I’ve been handcuffed before for their presumed safety.
1 Like
You’re interpretation is fundamentally flawed.
It’s a right, not a privilege.
1 Like
The answer is none.
You seem to be operating on emotion.
1 Like
Allegedly had a gun. The cops did not know he had one until until they detained him at gun point. The cops in the OP did not know if the alleged intruders were armed either. Neither situation was about the race of the people detained and neither sets of detainees were arrested once the police determined that no crime had been committed. That’s exactly how policing should be done.
1 Like
Your false equivalence is noted.
There is nothing false about it. Until they sort it out, cops are supposed to treat any suspect as guilty. Innocent until proven guilty is purely a court of law thing.
How is it false?
And is it noted on the his Permanent Record?
Says the old white guy.
Now, now. If you can’t do any better than that, move along.
2 Likes
No, says common sense and police procedure.
1 Like
Ah, Angela is back!
