Interviews are useless. Slightly above resumes.
Not when hiring engineers. I’d argue not when hiring anyone. I don’t know any successful business/hiring manager that hires every role based on just a resume.
Yes, when hiring “engineers”, even more so.
You didn’t pay attention; resumes are more useless than interviews.
I do, me. My “interviews” last 15 seconds.
Yes, when hiring “engineers”, even more so.
Dumbest take I’ve ever heard you give.
You didn’t pay attention; resumes are more useless than interviews.
Yes but both are important in their own way. Especially when I get 400 apps for roles that require 3-5 years of experience.
Each step is a way to weed out unqualified candidates. The job description, the resume, the interview, the 90 day probation.
Dumbest take I’ve ever heard you give.
Why? Qualifications for engineers can easily be evaluated on paper. Interviewing an engineer is probably the most useless exercise in labor.
Yes but both are important in their own way. Especially when I get 400 apps for roles that require 3-5 years of experience.
Each step is a way to weed out unqualified candidates. The job description, the resume, the interview, the 90 day probation.
I know you believe that. It’s the way it’s done. And you no doubt believe you’re a “great interviewer.” I get it, you need to believe it.
Problem is, it’s just not true.
I’m not suggesting you do anything differently, you can’t. It’s ok.
Each step is a way to weed out unqualified candidates.
How does an interview do that?
PurpnGold:Dumbest take I’ve ever heard you give.
Why? Qualifications for engineers can easily be evaluated on paper. Interviewing an engineer is probably the most useless exercise in labor.
Software engineers? They need to know how to code. They need to know how to debug.
I know you believe that. It’s the way it’s done. And you no doubt believe you’re a “great interviewer.” I get it, you need to believe it.
Problem is, it’s just not true.
I’m not suggesting you do anything differently, you can’t. It’s ok.
You would not last 5 mins in my job.
Software engineers? They need to know how to code. They need to know how to debug.
How does an interview prove that?
You would not last 5 mins in my job.
I’d have your job in a year.
PurpnGold:Each step is a way to weed out unqualified candidates.
How does an interview do that?
This isn’t serious is it? Tell me the truth… you are trolling me. Right?
WuWei: PurpnGold:Each step is a way to weed out unqualified candidates.
How does an interview do that?
This isn’t serious is it? Tell me the truth… you are trolling me. Right?
No, I can tell you anything you want to hear in an interview.
PurpnGold:Software engineers? They need to know how to code. They need to know how to debug.
How does an interview prove that?
You’d have my job in a year alright
If you are asking this… I’m confident my job is safe.
You aren’t thinking.
Are you a great interviewer?
Nobody ever slipped past your process? No weeds in the garden?
Yep, with no technical knowledge. I will need somebody with technical knowledge for about a week.
Are you a great interviewer?
Yes but not perfect.
Nobody ever slipped past your process?
Not for coding, no. You either can code or you can’t.
No weeds in the garden?
Sure, which is why the 90 day probation exists. But by this point, it’s an issue of work ethic and/or team fit. Not on whether or not they can code.
Not for coding, no. You either can code or you can’t.
How does an interview (or resume) prove that? Do their grades from Hahvad and Ala State not prove that?
Sure, which is why the 90 day probation exists. But by this point, it’s an issue of work ethic and/or team fit. Not on whether or not they can code.
That’s a try out. Now that works. Why 90?
But by this point, it’s an issue of work ethic and/or team fit. Not on whether or not they can code.
You think I can’t fake work ethic for 90 days?
I can’t bring in tacos twice a week for 90 days?
PurpnGold:Not for coding, no. You either can code or you can’t.
How does an interview (or resume) prove that? Do their grades from Hahvad and Ala State not prove that?
Coding tests. Design reviews. Reviewing their public GitHub commits.
That’s a try out. Now that works. Why 90?
Takes about 30 days to get familiar with coding environments and team. The next 60 is enough to show a commit history to evaluate code.
Not on whether or not they can code.
Do you give them a coding test?
Coding tests. Design reviews. Reviewing their public GitHub commits.
In an interview?
PurpnGold:Coding tests. Design reviews. Reviewing their public GitHub commits.
In an interview?
Yes, of course. It’s just a part. A stage in the process.