I understand what you have described very well. The issue becomes whether random restatement of long standing rules to fit the circumstances of a financially beleaguered chief executive is an appropriate use of Presidential power. Given what has been suggested regarding who had access to material at Mar A Lago and Bedminster, this might well fit the definition of a high crime.
While the President is the head of the Executive Branch, his actions are not as unconstrained as you suggest.
And remember, Trump chose to not rule arbitrarily in this matter when his son-in-law was challenged by those with delegated authority, so there is precedent.
We could each martial numerous examples of liberals and conservatives who evaded accountability and who were held accountable but frankly that would be an utter waste of time as there are enough examples to refute any complaint.
Those with enough money experience a very different justice system that those with less resources. Politics has nothing to do with it.
The agency authorizing the clearance kept having Kushner repeat the process until he provided a complete disclosure form. They did not yield to whatever the President decided as several here have suggested is how the process works.
So do you agree with the President when he demanded Trump surrender classified documents and support the legal case that ensued after he refused.
These documents were stored in a public club.
You were not an original, or delegated, authority under the regulations, which were derived from the Presidential Executive Orders. Your delusion of personal significance in those E.O.s is quite hilarious.
If we knew anything about that it would be⌠but those accusations seem to melt in the sunshine every time a light shines on them. Read Hurâs transcript and you can see why this fantasy has no legs.