I do. I don’t trust either. But social media allows people to claim they can keep you safe, while disallowing people to say HCQ with Zinc can keep you safe. The filter is therefore NOT science. It is political.
“you guys”?
i disagree with allowing the inclusion of other languages to derail a thread
i’m done in this thread
what a waste
It was 4 or 5 posts in 240 post thread. I don’t think that counts as derailing. Plus each post has a translation.
I get that there is stricter moderation now on tangents or side discussions. So I won’t continue it. But the thread wasn’t derailed.
Jezcoe: Paul_Thomson: Jezcoe: thinkingman:Oh sure they all say “it violates our policy” but it really isnt clear what policy that is
It sure seems like there’s a concerted effort to dismiss/hide/disparage anything about the Hydroxy… treatment for china’s plague
There were claims of a cure where none exists.
That is false and dangerous information to spread in a pandemic.
But calling sex using condoms “SAFE sex” during an AIDS epidemic and STD epidemics is fine?
Think of it like wearing a mask.
I do. I don’t trust either. But social media allows people to claim they can keep you safe, while disallowing people to say HCQ with Zinc can keep you safe. The filter is therefore NOT science. It is political.
There is no good evidence of the latter working.
That is the difference.
They shouldn’t call it a cure next time.
You can say it all you like.
There simply isn’t any evidence for it other than anecdotal.
It’s hard to prove a medicine works.
Even harder with an illness where you’ll likely get better on your own anyway.
Well, I certainly hope that the DoJ are investigating the prima facie case for collusion between media and political players to engineer deaths of people from COVID 19 for political advantage, and charges are laid against people like the two Cuomo Fredos.
Well, I certainly hope that the DoJ are investigating the prima facie case for collusion between media and political players to engineer deaths of people from COVID 19 for political advantage, and charges are laid against people like the two Cuomo Fredos.
Lol this was funny.
Oh wait…you were serious?
thinkingman: Snagglepuss: Weedhopper: LeroyBrown: Weedhopper:Experts fighting covid-19 on the frontlines!
Wake up
Um no. These were 4 MDs thrown together to peddle a “cure” President Trump made the mistake of promoting when he only had partial information. The name Frontline doctors was selected not because they are on the front line against SARS-CoV-2 but to make people will think they are.
Granted this lie took a little more than a Sharpie and a weather map, but the problem is that once you get real people involved with histories that can be traced down it becomes harder to perpetrate a fraud.
Not the first Doctor on the frontlines fighting this virus to say it works, in fact they say it’s a crime against humanity to not give them Hydroxychloroquine.
Seems like those known liars want us think it wont help. Like they have credibility to make such an accusation over the experts on the frontlines.
Either you’ve been suckered, or you’re trying to sucker everyone else. Neither speaks well of you…
try not to make your posts all about the poster
i know it’s hard when you have no argument
That’s hilarious…you guys are trying to prop up a bunch of doctors as if they are experts on Covid treatment, but they’ve been proven to be frauds and the evidence has been shown here in this thread, but we’re the ones with no argument…
Sure thing…
What evadance have you shown that these experts haven’t saved lives with Hydrochloroqin?
What evadance have you shown that these experts haven’t saved lives with Hydrochloroqin?
Its all throughout the thread, and not just by me. Try keeping up with the discussions if you want to be taken seriously.
Its all throughout the thread, and not just by me. Try keeping up with the discussions if you want to be taken seriously.
No one has proven that they didn’t save lives with Hydrochloroqin.
No one has proven that they didn’t save lives with Hydrochloroqin.
Whatever you say, chuckles.
It’s is not scientific practice to prove a non-proof.
Weedhopper:No one has proven that they didn’t save lives with Hydrochloroqin.
Whatever you say, chuckles.
And you can’t say. chuckles
You can lead a horse’s backside to evidence, but you can’t make him believe.
It’s is not scientific practice to prove a non-proof.
They saved lives with Hydrochloroqin, meaning they have proof.
Snagglepuss:Its all throughout the thread, and not just by me. Try keeping up with the discussions if you want to be taken seriously.
No one has proven that they didn’t save lives with Hydrochloroqin.
Of course because scientists don’t prove a negative.
That you even ask this question reveals your mistaken assumptions about science. You don’t know what the null hypothesis should be.
What’s been stated…over and over again…is there’s no evidence it DOES save lives…doctor’s anecdotes aside. Because you don’t prove efficacy via anecdote.
Weedhopper: Snagglepuss:Its all throughout the thread, and not just by me. Try keeping up with the discussions if you want to be taken seriously.
No one has proven that they didn’t save lives with Hydrochloroqin.
Of course because scientists don’t prove a negative.
What’s been stated…over and over again…is there’s no evidence it DOES save lives…doctor’s anecdotes aside. Because you don’t prove efficacy via anecdote.
No they saved lives with Hydrochloroqin, not debatable with the fact it saves lives.
JayJay: Weedhopper: Snagglepuss:Its all throughout the thread, and not just by me. Try keeping up with the discussions if you want to be taken seriously.
No one has proven that they didn’t save lives with Hydrochloroqin.
Of course because scientists don’t prove a negative.
What’s been stated…over and over again…is there’s no evidence it DOES save lives…doctor’s anecdotes aside. Because you don’t prove efficacy via anecdote.
No they saved lives with Hydrochloroqin, not debatable with the fact it saves lives.
How do you know they saved lives with HCQ?
What’s your evidence?
You can lead a horse’s backside to evidence, but you can’t make him believe.
Seems to be the case with these experts on the front lines. They have the evidence but those not on the front lines polatitions, fauci refuse to believe it.
Weedhopper: JayJay: Weedhopper: Snagglepuss:Its all throughout the thread, and not just by me. Try keeping up with the discussions if you want to be taken seriously.
No one has proven that they didn’t save lives with Hydrochloroqin.
Of course because scientists don’t prove a negative.
What’s been stated…over and over again…is there’s no evidence it DOES save lives…doctor’s anecdotes aside. Because you don’t prove efficacy via anecdote.
No they saved lives with Hydrochloroqin, not debatable with the fact it saves lives.
How do you know they saved lives with HCQ?
What’s your evidence?
How do you know they didn’t.
That wasn’t your first claim.
But it looks like we’re going goalpost skating, so:
You are familiar with the differences between correlation and causation?