It literally does not.
try again,
A source told Fox News that the messages were part of a **new**ly released batch of Strzok-Page communications from Justice Department Inspector General Michael Horowitz, uncovered as part of his investigation into the start of the FBIâs Russia investigation.
it literally says newly released. your article
Try again, this time instead of just reading a part of a word in a sentence, read the whole sentence and take in its meaning.
New Strzok-Page texts reveal others were âleaking like madâ in lead up to Trump-Russia probe
is the first word new?
In two different threads, as have you.
I donât put faith in any of them
Listen dude, the timpani is in the attic so there will be no drum roll. Out with it.
uggg
a North Carolina politician
who put faith in strzok?
See where getting back to the part where people who can read well are smashing into those who canât and I just donât know what to do about it. Sneaky, youâre can read gud, tell me point blank where Iâm wrong and tell me why you believe Meadows lil narrative here.
have you ever been proven wrong? I do not think you can comprehend when you are wrong. therefore you are always right.
Also, this is â â â â â â â hilarious. Iâm starting that patreon.
can you read the word NEWLY
Out with what?
It seems like you are.
The punchline youâve set up twice.
No, this isnât binary, just because I know is Meadows weaving another tale and that heâs an ass doesnât mean I have faith in stzock. câmon man.
You said Horowitz addressed all this or something to that effect. He was very clear about scope in his report.
I get the impression he is very unhappy with Strzok.
Ok, if you say so.
